aaai * successful meeting at AAAI-90. Passed with no opposition.

able * real alternative places to eat, but the hotel may be able to work

about * At this point a comment about the Agenda of the meeting being a
* (TC) and good mailing list (PAMI). IEEE-CS charges about $2.00 per
* 1. ICCV95: Eric Grimson. 600 submissions with about 450 arriving
* 1300+ pages per year (from 6 and about 850). The backlog is 85 papers,
* 160 papers. One issue to think about is the single track, which would
* 2 year, PAMI is down about 7%.
* 2. 1995 Budget: L. Shapiro. The current budget is about $14.8K for 1996 $15K
* 20 associate editors, about 10,000 copies of each issue, $24/year for
* 210 papers were submitted, expect about 40%-60%. This meeting
* Agenda item #12: The budget for 1989 and 1990 is about $12000 each,
*

  • The current size of 300+ people and 100 papers is about right.
    * After more discussion about whether it is right or wrong to submit to
    * Agenda item #1: CVPR88 (R. Jain): About 350 at the
    * Agenda item #2: CVPR91: Current registration at about 290.
    * allow for about 70-80 papers, or the posters which results in about
    * Attendees were about evenly divided among members, students, and
    * conference, upstairs rooms are HOT. (L. Davis): about 270
    * expect about 300 papers submitted with 90 accepted (30 long, 60 short).
    * expenses were about $13.4K sinced it was budgeted at 55 people.
    * Goldgof/Medioni program chair. (PC about 30 people).
    * Graphics, Probabilistic Reasoning. Currently about 1 paper per day. Of
    * Huang) This issue grows from concerns about the different meetings
    * IEEE-CS generates about $300,000 from the Trans-PAMI (due to most of
    * if accepted). After decisions are made, there will be about 7-10 days
    * in weather. Airfares are about $800-900 from London, and $1000 from
    * J. Mundy met to make final decisions, about 1/2 accepted. The top 4
    * mailing costs dominate at about $8K to $10K each. The IAPR newsletter
    * non-US participants failed to receive the newsletter. The mailings cost about
    * page count (from 900 to 1350) and is now at about 1 issue. Proposals
    * Processing Society (Dave Munson) approached the Computer Society about a
    * selected. The cost is about the same as NYC. The banquet location
    * so about 100 papers are expected. Pre-conference tutorials are being
    * submissions are at about 20-30 per month with about 12 papers in each
    * submissions number about 450/year and get 3 reviews.
    * submitted, 44 accepted, + 2 invited. The income was about $20K, and the
    * that. The number that attend both is small. Comment about the
    * the 18 is not. The current paper backlog for publication is 114 (about
    * The conference has (currently) about 250 students, 230-250 members,
    * The CS has a paid staff of about 90 (most in publications areas),
    * The fee should be about $250 with an expected attendance of 300 (200
    * There are about 1290 pages in the volume this year, or roughly 100 papers.
    * There is a Workshop on Motion every about 3 years. Discussion of Florida
    * were submitted and 3 reviewers will be used. About 35 are expected.
    * with 100K members, about 150 core volunteers, and 10-15K other
    * with China. H. Freeman discussed the organizing problems. About 680
    47 for about.

    above * (Mulkagnar and Haralick), With the above meeting. 1-2 days, some
    * 1993 (see Tampa proposal above) and North East (NY area) 1993.
    * meeting, if both reviews gave a 4 or above, the paper was accepted. If
    * the chairs as indicated above.

    abstain * Approved (Yes: 18, Abstain: 8).
    * international conferences. Passed Yes: 11, No: 9, Abstain: 7.
    * passed with Yes: 18, No: 0, Abstain 6.
    * Passed: Yes:22, No:0, Abstain:6.
    * program. Passed: Yes:22, No:4, Abstain:3.
    * Shirai) was Yes:35, No: 22, Abstain 6, with a strong minority support for
    * size of short papers be increased was passed: Yes 25, No 18, Abstain 6.
    * The by-laws were passed by Yes: 20, No: 0, and Abstain: 7.
    * was tabled by a vote of Yes (to table) 16, No 11, Abstain 14. Thus, no change
    * Yes: 26, No: 0, Abstain: 2. Passed.
    10 for abstain.

    abstention * Passed with 1 abstention.

    abstract * 618 registered. The 1992 submission is a 2500 word abstract and will

    abstracting * abstracting.] Posters are at "Prime" times with a long break for the

    acceptable * some emphasis on the fact that Pattern Recognition papers are acceptable. Need to

    acceptance *

  • Favor wider acceptance criteria (larger number of papers) since the
    * acceptance rate is currently less than T-PAMI and the review is so much

    accepted * Accepted.
    * accepted), 92 foreign (19 accepted), 22 industrial papers. The numbers
    * accepted.
    * Amendment: Accepted the friendly Amendment to make it apply to the
    * and making too much money. Papers 450 papers accepted 89 and 90
    * both, CVPR received accepted ECCV titles.)
    * China, 230 accepted + 110 posters + 15 invited papers (40 from China).
    * expect about 300 papers submitted with 90 accepted (30 long, 60 short).
    * if accepted). After decisions are made, there will be about 7-10 days
    * J. Mundy met to make final decisions, about 1/2 accepted. The top 4
    * meeting, if both reviews gave a 4 or above, the paper was accepted. If
    * registered, 18 or 30 submissions were accepted.
    * submitted 35 long and 54 short papers accepted.
    * submitted, 44 accepted, + 2 invited. The income was about $20K, and the
    15 for accepted.

    access * ftp.ads.com for access (there are some images already available from
    * restrictions) from the East Coast. Access is through Miami or San Juan.

    acclamation * Carries by acclamation.

    acclimation * Carried by acclimation.

    accomodations * Discussion of the hotel costs, and possible dorm accomodations, and

    according * Discussion of who is a member of the TC (according to IEEE) the IEEE

    account * 10 issues). This accounts for some of the requests to shorten the
    * account limit of $30K at any one time. The surplus helps ease planning
    * current limit on funds in a TC account is $30,000 at one time. The

    accv * Rooms range from $15-$150, with the University connections. ACCV (Asian

    acharya * (Goldgof, Acharya) Friday after CVPR. Q: on name multiple sensors

    acquiring * ICPR to approximately 75 papers each by acquiring a fifth room.

    action * changes, control of conferences, and possible TAB actions regarding the
    * No action on our part.

    active * get them to become active again. Maybe it needs a separate
    * solely the Computer Society, Active group with several conferences

    activities * control over its income, its mailing list, its activities (including
    * Sporting Activities etc. are the types of ideas. Also tied to ARPA

    add * committee of 50 people. Try to add other workshops around ICCV, if
    * Discussions on Image data base, cam PAMI do anything (i.e. add the
    * images used in papers to a data base), when to add since the student
    * pressures on the program chairs to add papers.
    * Q: Membership size (current 800), add this time 200 people. CS
    * the fall of 1990 with someone from Japan as a co-chair, and add 7 more
    6 for add.

    added * and J. Sklansky was added as a US representative. J. Aggarwal was elected as
    * are added. We currently claim >1000 members for the IAPR which gives
    * editorial board added N. Ahuja (replacing W. Thompson) and H. Baird
    * January 1991, added new editors (16 associate editors) to reduce the

    addition * 2 years of non-participation and addition by a petition of 10 members
    * Eric G: Herb hit the issue, control over our fate in addition to
    * Item 1. The previous minutes were approved with an addition to
    * The budget allows us to ask for more money (in addition to the

    additional * expanding to a 5th track if space is available. Additional comments
    * is as follows. Please send additional agenda items to Linda Shapiro,
    * to fund additional pages in a transactions from a conference.

    addressed * Concerns regarding the cost were addressed. The hotel is $120 in 1997

    addresses * Have email addresses for authors. Inform authors of the rules, etc. for
    * TC will prepare a proposal regarding conferences that addresses these

    adjourn * Adjourn 8:55PM.

    adjourned * Meeting adjourned at 10:35PM
    * Meeting adjourned at 11:03.
    * of CVPR-89 and adjourned at 10:30.
    * The meeting was adjourned at 12:15 on December 6.

    admendment * Admendment that the dates will be held until until Boston in 95.
    * Item 11. No admendments to consider.

    admin * registration 15, CS Admin 24, Contigeny 17, Treasureer and bank 5,

    admitting * Club is going to vote as to admitting women as members.

    ads * ftp.ads.com for access (there are some images already available from
    * know where the images are. Phil Kahn (ADS and the net news vision

    advance * Program Comm: 40; Office 22, Advance program 22, call for papers

    advanced * DARPA: RCDE for aerial images and IUE (an advanced RCDE). Asked for

    advantage * one is at 1K. Advantage is wide circulation because of being

    aerial * DARPA: RCDE for aerial images and IUE (an advanced RCDE). Asked for

    afips * AFIPS dissolved, the IEEE-Computer Society assumed responsibility
    * The Harry Goode Award was created by AFIPS in 1964 and in 1990 when

    afraid * Steve: afraid that the number that would commit to the time is low.

    after * #2 Discussion (Kak): did we broaden the scope? After the last one
    * (Goldgof, Acharya) Friday after CVPR. Q: on name multiple sensors
    * 1991 in Bonn). Saturday before or after CVPR.
    * Agenda item #0: The minutes were approved after some discussion of whether
    * after 5 meetings in cities (well Champaign-Urbana). Several things
    * After more discussion about whether it is right or wrong to submit to
    * and workshops, it is time to grow beyond a TC after 22 years,
    * bound to mail the newsletter to its members. After discussion
    * Changes made in the executive committee (Section 3.2) were removal after
    * if accepted). After decisions are made, there will be about 7-10 days
    * in 1994. Planned for June 20-21 (after CVPR) 1996, with a
    * India selected after 2 rounds of voting. India led after the first round.
    * Motion: (Tom Binford) That IEEE-PAMI-TC withdraw from IAPR. After
    * November 14) after problems arose
    * On the MTW after Thanksgiving in 1994 (November 28-30) (Hanson as
    * only make hard decisions after the reviews have done most of the
    * The call for papers is out. There are 4 days before and 4 days after
    * [Later, after the proposers stated that December 1997 would be
    19 for after.

    afternoon * Morning session, afternoon Ski, evening session. July 1 deadline.

    again * Again for Terry Boult for local arrangements.
    * get them to become active again. Maybe it needs a separate

    agarwal * 2. Non-rigid Motion Workshop. Jake Agarwal. Held last October.

    agenda * AGENDA
    * AGENDA: Version 4.0
    * At this point a comment about the Agenda of the meeting being a
    * Agenda item #0: The minutes were approved after some discussion of whether
    * Agenda item #10: The revised by-laws, distributed at ICCV-II, were
    * Agenda item #11: The term of J. Aggarwal ends on May 31, 1989.
    * Agenda item #12: The budget for 1989 and 1990 is about $12000 each,
    * Agenda item #1: R. Bajcsy gave a report on ICCV-II: There were 306 papers
    * Agenda item #2: No report on the Time-varying Imagery Workshop.
    * Agenda item #3: R. Chellappa gave a report on CVPR-89: 327 papers have been
    * Agenda item #4: The PAMI newsletter has been sent out to the full
    * Agenda item #5: The current distribution of the IAPR newsletter will
    * Agenda item #6: Proposal for a workshop on three-dimensional structures
    * Agenda item #7: H. Freeman reported that ICPR will be held in Atlantic City on
    * Agenda item #8: E. Riseman gave the report on the study of holding ICCV-III
    * Agenda item #9: No CVPR in 1990.
    * Agenda item #0: The minutes of the last meeting were approved
    * Agenda item #10: CVPR93 Proposals and discussion:
    * Agenda item #10: Transactions on PAMI (S. Tanimoto): At the Publications
    * Agenda item #11: ICCV (J. Aggarwal): Discussion of the need to hold such
    * Agenda item #11: Workshop on Computer Vision Applications: December 2-4,
    * Agenda item #11a: Performance Characterization of Vision Algorithms
    * Agenda item #12: Newsletter. None.
    * Agenda item #12: Proposed Bylaws, postponed to the meeting at ICCV2, with
    * Agenda item #13: Conference guidelines (R. Haralick): Discussion of the
    * Agenda item #13: Transactions on PAMI: (A. K. Jain) Took over in
    * Agenda item #14: Transactions on Image Processing, (A. K. Jain) The
    * Agenda item #15: New Chair: T. Huang's term ends July 30. A committee
    * Agenda item #16: New Business: Bobick discussed the Optical Society of
    * Agenda item #1: CVPR88 (R. Jain): About 350 at the
    * Agenda Item #1: CVPR92, Narendra Ahuja. There were 357 submissions,
    * Agenda item #1: The minutes of the last meeting were approved.
    * Agenda item #2: CVPR91: Current registration at about 290.
    * Agenda Item #2: CVPR93, Ruud Bolle. The hotel contract has been
    * Agenda item #2: ICPR 88 (H. Freeman): Moved to Rome Italy (starting
    * Agenda item #3: AIPR88: Scheduled for the Cosmos Club in DC, but cannot
    * Agenda item #3: CAD-Based Vision June 2-3: (Linda Shapiro) 69 were
    * Agenda Item #3: CVPR94, Linda Shapiro. The plans continue with the
    * Agenda Item #3a: Morphology workshop, Ed Delp. Was going to be this
    * Agenda Item #3b: Ramesh Jain was awarded his certificate for
    * Agenda item #4: Document Processing Workshop, September 30: (Bob
    * Agenda Item #4: ICCV-93. The call for papers was available at CVPR.
    * Agenda item #4: ICCV88 (A. Rosenfeld): A large number of
    * Agenda Item #4a: ICCV 95. As the by-laws do not allow deciding
    * Agenda item #5: Motion Workshop (October 7-9) (P. Anandan): 125 papers
    * Agenda item #5: Motion Workshop (R. Jain): The paper deadline
    * Agenda Item #5: Qualitative Vision Workshop: Phil Kahn. In
    * Agenda Item #6: CAD Based Vision, K. Ikeuchi. Roughly the fall of
    * Agenda item #6: CVPR89 (R. Chellappa): At the Sheraton Grand
    * Agenda item #6: Workshop on Mathematical Morphology (Spring, Kentucky):
    * Agenda item #7: CAIA (R. Haralick): CAIA is now run at the
    * Agenda item #7: ICPR 1992: (Herb Freeman) 1990 ICPR had a surplus with
    * Agenda Item #7: TC Budget and IEEE-CS rules: A Kak. The budget
    * Agenda item #8: CVPR 1992, June 15-20, Urbana IL. (N. Ahuja):
    * Agenda item #8: PAMI Newsletter (A. Rosenfeld): It took 3 years to get
    * Agenda Item #8: PAMI Transactions, Anil Jain. 12 issues, 1300 pages,
    * Agenda item #9: ICCV93: Berlin (May?): Date not certain (partly due to
    * Agenda item #9: J. Aggarwal discussed the need for several officers.
    * Agenda Item #9: The PAMI Newsletter, A. Rosenfeld. (Continuation of
    * is as follows. Please send additional agenda items to Linda Shapiro,
    * The agenda so far for the June PAMI Technical Committee Meeting
    61 for agenda.

    aggarwal * c. Singapore proposal: Mital, Aggarwal, Ullman, Kittler
    * #1. CVPR93 (Aggarwal, Aloimonos, Bolle). Between 440 and 450 people
    * (Bob Haralick, Jake Aggarwal, T. Huang and Jack Sklansky). The proposal
    * Agenda item #11: The term of J. Aggarwal ends on May 31, 1989.
    * Agenda item #11: ICCV (J. Aggarwal): Discussion of the need to hold such
    * Agenda item #9: J. Aggarwal discussed the need for several officers.
    * Aggarwal and A. Rosenfeld) on June 5. The program committee has 20
    * and J. Sklansky was added as a US representative. J. Aggarwal was elected as
    * Huang, Jake Aggarwal, A Rosenfeld, Avi Kak, Herb Freeman. Nominated
    * it now goes to the entire PAMI subscriber list. J. Aggarwal
    * Item 2. Announcements. Tom Huang thanked Jake Aggarwal for his
    * Item 8. ICPR. (Jake Aggarwal) Atlantic City, June 17-21, 1990 (new
    * J. Aloimonos (J. Aggarwal chair) proposed the NorthEast with industry
    * Jake Aggarwal is now President of IAPR.
    * of A. Rosenfeld, H. Freeman, E. Riseman, J. Aggarwal nominated A. Kak
    * Treasurer: Jake Aggarwal, Secretary: Keith Price, Vice-Chair: Eric
    16 for aggarwal.

    ago * Patrick: How things have changed? Year ago budget was $4K, now

    agreement * the agreement that the newsletter would go to all PAMI subscribers, but
    * with agreement that the number of sessions should be limited, and

    ahuja * d. India proposal: Ahuja
    * Agenda Item #1: CVPR92, Narendra Ahuja. There were 357 submissions,
    * Agenda item #8: CVPR 1992, June 15-20, Urbana IL. (N. Ahuja):
    * editorial board added N. Ahuja (replacing W. Thompson) and H. Baird
    * Thanks given to N. Ahuja, T. Huang and A. Rosenfeld for their work on

    aid * and 70 posters. The submission included a summary page to aid the

    aipr * balance. (Gerson commented on AIPR, heavily industrial.) Discussion

    aipr88 * Agenda item #3: AIPR88: Scheduled for the Cosmos Club in DC, but cannot

    airfare * in weather. Airfares are about $800-900 from London, and $1000 from
    * out a cheaper meal alternative. Airfare is $400-500 (with no Saturday
    * September is the best season. Airfares are around $1000. (US or Europe)

    algorithm * Agenda item #11a: Performance Characterization of Vision Algorithms
    * the internals of algorithm. Function, Language, Scenarios,

    all * A gang of 7 is assembling an all-electronic on physics based vision.
    * discussion, many (all?)
    * Discussion: the TC chair appoints all delegates, with nominal renewal every
    * do 3 reviews for all submissions. PAMI subscriptions have decreased
    * IEEE is recommending that all TCs have some structure that will make
    * in 5 years that all will be available in CDRom, a trend to CDRom.
    * in <3 months. A citation analysis and impact report (by IEEE for all
    * leave IEEE. All of these involve doing a lot of work, and there is
    * publications) showed that PAMI was the highest of all Transactions.
    * question of whether one conference can handle all of them is another
    * recognition, all in one place. This gives a conference ranging from AI
    * size necessitated by the number of papers) meeting for all papers, sub
    * the agreement that the newsletter would go to all PAMI subscribers, but
    * the least (all are down). Down 3%. Trans-C down 10% Possibility
    * the production of all transactions was shifted from NJ (IEEE) to CA
    * third Computer Vision meeting in 2.5 months, all in California, and this
    16 for all.

    allen * Allen Newell, Larry Roberts, King-Sun Fu.

    allocation * was requested. The allocation is 1/3 of the conference surplus plus some more

    allow * Agenda Item #4a: ICCV 95. As the by-laws do not allow deciding
    * allow for about 70-80 papers, or the posters which results in about
    * this meeting at 250 Eric wanted 450 and the CS finally did allow 350.
    * We will allow members to request a no paper option.

    allowable * limitations of the number of allowable papers (3 and 4 tracks...).

    allowed * allowed by the Computer Society. The question is wheather to charge
    * papers this allowed, but there was still strong support for the

    allows * The budget allows us to ask for more money (in addition to the

    almost * We are almost a society now, the intellectual center is not

    aloimonos * #1. CVPR93 (Aggarwal, Aloimonos, Bolle). Between 440 and 450 people
    * Considering a workshop on Purposive Vision (Aloimonos and Rosenfeld).
    * J. Aloimonos (J. Aggarwal chair) proposed the NorthEast with industry

    along * arranged along with a one day workshop.

    already * ftp.ads.com for access (there are some images already available from
    * requirement for new unpublished work already stated in the call for
    * the call for papers is already out, what it real means, how much

    also * and we should do that. Also people to nominate IEEE Fellows.
    * are comparable to past meetings. He also observed that this is the
    * pay attention to the workshop and conference budgets. This also
    * Sporting Activities etc. are the types of ideas. Also tied to ARPA
    * were sent out for determining the Roberts award. There was also some

    alternative * continued. With possibly different alternatives for the future of
    * out a cheaper meal alternative. Airfare is $400-500 (with no Saturday
    * real alternative places to eat, but the hotel may be able to work

    always * plan). As always, encourage associated workshops like this one.

    amend * Move to Amend to ask the current 4 members of the TC to go to

    amended * Vote on Amended motion: Carried.

    amendment * Amendment that email list be created and a separate non-email.
    * Amendment to start as electronic and keep in this form.
    * Amendment: Accepted the friendly Amendment to make it apply to the

    america * America) even if ICCV is held and to get ICCV on a regular stable
    * America, (Lasers and Human Vision).
    * and 10 from Asia, 10 from Europe, and 11 from North America).

    americal * Americal individual subscribers of PAMI, approximately 10K people. The

    american * a North American location should be presented at that time. There was

    among * Attendees were about evenly divided among members, students, and
    * votes among the membership by mail and not just who comes to the

    amount * amount of paper the program chair needs to handle and mail out.

    anal * Doc anal, 1 on medical. Panel, single track.
    * papers as good. In this one Doc Anal had 2 submitted and 1 is in.

    analysis * #10. 1994 Workshop on Multi-Dimensional Biomedical Image Analysis
    * #13. Proposal for a 1995 Workshop on CV/Motion Analysis (Medioni,
    * 2. 2nd Document Analysis and Recognitin Conference: R. Haralick
    * 4. Third International Conference on Document Analysis and
    * 5. Fourth International Conference of Document Analysis and
    * Computer Vision and document analysis. (Haralick) perspective on
    * in <3 months. A citation analysis and impact report (by IEEE for all
    * in Object Recognition; Multi-Dim medical analysis(F)) Still space
    * Q: did it not include good people (e.g. document image analysis --
    * short, 400 attended. Document analysis is fast moving and growing
    10 for analysis.

    analyze * Performance characterization issues, analyze problem of numerical

    anandan * Agenda item #5: Motion Workshop (October 7-9) (P. Anandan): 125 papers

    anaysis * Anaysis. Character recognition, engineering drawings, and music are the

    anil * #9. PAMI Transactions (Anil Jain) 1 submission per day, working
    * Agenda Item #8: PAMI Transactions, Anil Jain. 12 issues, 1300 pages,
    * delayed (due to audience members, etc.). Complain to Anil if there
    * Item 10. Transactionns-PAMI. (Anil Jain for S. Tanimoto) The
    * Item 6. 3-D Workshop Austin TX, Nov 27-29, 1989. (Anil Jain) The
    * to be held in December 1989 with Anil Jain as the general chair. This
    6 for anil.

    ann * Ann Arbor, MI

    annecy * a. Annecy, France (near Grenoble) proposal: Mohr, Horaud, Crowley

    announced * Announced.
    * service as the past chair. The appointed officers were announced:

    announcement * #15. Announcement of "Physics-Based Vision Newsletter" (Shafer)
    * announcement.
    * Announcements:
    * I. Announcements:
    * Item 2. Announcements. Tom Huang thanked Jake Aggarwal for his
    * IV. Meeting Announcements/Approvals:
    * Meeting Announcements/Approvals:
    7 for announcement.

    annual * A. Califano (Motion to make annual)
    * does a 5 year annual purge (or some such).
    * there is an annual conference in roughly late June in the US (or North

    anonymous * list) volunteered the vision list archive with anonymous FTP from

    another * covered the cost. The prposal is to have another on next year (CVPR
    * prices), e.g. one package is CVPR, another is CVPR+xxx, etc.
    * question of whether one conference can handle all of them is another

    anudi * 15, proceedings 32, final program 10, anudi/visual 5, Keynotes 10,

    any * (Grimson:) PAMI generates 300K for the CS, but does not get any
    * account limit of $30K at any one time. The surplus helps ease planning
    * commented that the TC keeps a portion of any conference surplus with an
    * guidelines and other TC officers). Send any comments to E. Kent.
    * is that any papers submitted to both conferences (i.e. CVPR and ICCV)
    * makes money can we get any? No. Journals have nothing to do with
    * of the proceedings, Eric was told that any more would cost
    7 for any.

    anything * Discussions on Image data base, cam PAMI do anything (i.e. add the
    * pages, money, awards, etc. So, could we do anything to improve

    anyway * possiblity that IAPR would kick the US out anyway, and that IAPR might

    apart * whether one month or 6 months apart, travel to major conferences

    apentland * Steering Committee: TSHuang, APentland, PStucki, sponsored by

    appear * IEEE Computer will feature 1 or 2 TCs each issue. PAMI will appear in

    applications * #12. Proposal for a second Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (Dyer).
    * #5. Report on 1992 Applications of Computer Vision (Bhanu). First WS,
    * Agenda item #11: Workshop on Computer Vision Applications: December 2-4,
    * conferences is a terrible idea -- applications drive CV. More
    * papers that have been excluded in the past (PR, IP, applications).

    applied * Performance vs. robustness. Applied statistics and others.
    * theory/applied). Are separate tracks separate budgets, proceedings,

    apply * Amendment: Accepted the friendly Amendment to make it apply to the

    appointed * Establish an executive committee of 12 appointed by the
    * service as the past chair. The appointed officers were announced:

    appoints * Discussion: the TC chair appoints all delegates, with nominal renewal every

    approached * Processing Society (Dave Munson) approached the Computer Society about a

    approaches * mathematical approaches of expert systems, etc. are desired. The

    approvals * IV. Meeting Announcements/Approvals:
    * Meeting Announcements/Approvals:

    approved * Agenda item #0: The minutes were approved after some discussion of whether
    * Agenda item #0: The minutes of the last meeting were approved
    * Agenda item #1: The minutes of the last meeting were approved.
    * Approved (Yes: 18, Abstain: 8).
    * Approved.
    * budget was approved.
    * chairs approved last year. The Seattle Westin Hotel has been
    * Item 1. The previous minutes were approved with an addition to
    8 for approved.

    approximately * Americal individual subscribers of PAMI, approximately 10K people. The
    * ICPR to approximately 75 papers each by acquiring a fifth room.
    * Item 13. New business. CVPR 1991 (approximately June). Need

    arbor * Ann Arbor, MI

    architecture * dates). There are 4 distinct tracks: Computer Architecture, Signal

    archive * list) volunteered the vision list archive with anonymous FTP from

    are * 3. PAMI Journal. Kasturi. So far in 1995, there are 220 submissions.
    * abstracting.] Posters are at "Prime" times with a long break for the
    * Anaysis. Character recognition, engineering drawings, and music are the
    * are added. We currently claim >1000 members for the IAPR which gives
    * are comparable to past meetings. He also observed that this is the
    * are problems. Please to review in a timely manner. Authors should
    * choices to consider are US Virgin Islands and Cancun (Mexico)
    * conference, upstairs rooms are HOT. (L. Davis): about 270
    * dates). There are 4 distinct tracks: Computer Architecture, Signal
    * determine, then the papers are different), can we trust the authors.
    * dimensions are being confused (selectivity, topic area,
    * discussion are:
    * discussion on what it means to broaden the meeting, but are the
    * Even though publications are separate from the TCs it may be possible
    * ftp.ads.com for access (there are some images already available from
    * if accepted). After decisions are made, there will be about 7-10 days
    * important so that PAMI members are considered for awards, fellows, and
    * in weather. Airfares are about $800-900 from London, and $1000 from
    * know where the images are. Phil Kahn (ADS and the net news vision
    * list and By-Laws are not being followed.
    * mathematical approaches of expert systems, etc. are desired. The
    * no more than 35 to one member. There are 92 non-US papers. A January
    * open up the process. But we are not keeping track of who comes and
    * papers are available at CVPR. Mandate related to ICDR, but in the
    * papers are expected, but only 50-60 per track (240 total) will be
    * papers, the papers and attendees are not there. It takes more to
    * publication. So an issue of who are the members so that business
    * reviewers are used (more than the committee) for 311 papers, 197 US, 23
    * September is the best season. Airfares are around $1000. (US or Europe)
    * should be included in ICCV-3, since they are an important part of the
    * so about 100 papers are expected. Pre-conference tutorials are being
    * So far, there are 316 pre registered and 53 walk-ins (369). An
    * some emphasis on the fact that Pattern Recognition papers are acceptable. Need to
    * Sporting Activities etc. are the types of ideas. Also tied to ARPA
    * Steve: If there are enough people who feel that we should look at
    * submissions are at about 20-30 per month with about 12 papers in each
    * Tanimoto comment, there are many things that can be done and are
    * that are available for tutorials and/or workshops.
    * The call for papers is out. There are 4 days before and 4 days after
    * the conference numbers are decreasing so the CS requires budgeting
    * the least (all are down). Down 3%. Trans-C down 10% Possibility
    * the TCs. Other journals in CS are less related others are
    * theory/applied). Are separate tracks separate budgets, proceedings,
    * There are about 1290 pages in the volume this year, or roughly 100 papers.
    * there are cheaper nearby hotels. Meal costs are a larger issue -- no
    * there are not the other conferences that make tons of money.
    * too high) are based on a formula. For the computer area as a whole,
    * transactions subscriptions are down around 10% each of the last
    * unknown number of these are students. The original budget projection
    * Vision and Graphics, Learning in Computer Vision. There are new
    * We are almost a society now, the intellectual center is not
    * We are now maintaining our own list
    * were submitted and 3 reviewers will be used. About 35 are expected.
    * Who are members for IAPR issues. We do not have a good structure of
    * within IEEE, and the low cost. Private publishers are happy to
    59 for are.

    area * 1993 (see Tampa proposal above) and North East (NY area) 1993.
    * area.
    * areas covered, etc. A discussion of how to deal with these and how to
    * dimensions are being confused (selectivity, topic area,
    * On CVPR94, the area of Image Processing is not called out.
    * The CS has a paid staff of about 90 (most in publications areas),
    * too high) are based on a formula. For the computer area as a whole,
    7 for area.

    arose * November 14) after problems arose

    around * and 100 members (around 600 registered so far). From 24 countries and
    * committee of 50 people. Try to add other workshops around ICCV, if
    * Hotels run around $100 on the sea front. Proposal was June, but that
    * September is the best season. Airfares are around $1000. (US or Europe)
    * transactions subscriptions are down around 10% each of the last

    arpa * Sporting Activities etc. are the types of ideas. Also tied to ARPA

    arrange * too late for them to arrange locations, there will be a meeting

    arranged * arranged along with a one day workshop.

    arrangement * Again for Terry Boult for local arrangements.
    * do local arrangements.
    * get the proper arrangement with IEEE. Fundamental issue is that we
    * Recognition for local arrangements (Terry Boult).
    * work with IEEE to work on a better arrangement to have greater

    arriving * 1. ICCV95: Eric Grimson. 600 submissions with about 450 arriving

    asia * and 10 from Asia, 10 from Europe, and 11 from North America).

    asian * Rooms range from $15-$150, with the University connections. ACCV (Asian

    ask * Move to Amend to ask the current 4 members of the TC to go to
    * committee to ask authors if they have an overlap in their
    * The budget allows us to ask for more money (in addition to the

    asked * DARPA: RCDE for aerial images and IUE (an advanced RCDE). Asked for
    * Howard Moraff (NSF) asked to maintain the high standards in the process.
    * posters. A discussion on the roe of posters. Joe Mundy asked the

    asking * Steve: Partly surplus and asking for more.

    assembled * committee is being assembled and will meet at the University of

    assembling * A gang of 7 is assembling an all-electronic on physics based vision.

    assignment * from Europe as the program chairs. [Y. Shirai reported that the assignment

    associate * 20 associate editors, about 10,000 copies of each issue, $24/year for
    * get papers from each of the 20 associate editors -- some effort to
    * January 1991, added new editors (16 associate editors) to reduce the

    associated * (for presented and other papers). There will be an associated Passive
    * plan). As always, encourage associated workshops like this one.

    association * Bombay, mid-December. In association with other meetings in Bombay,

    assp * new Transactions on Image Processing (ASSP has changed its name to

    assumed * AFIPS dissolved, the IEEE-Computer Society assumed responsibility

    atlantic * Agenda item #7: H. Freeman reported that ICPR will be held in Atlantic City on
    * Item 8. ICPR. (Jake Aggarwal) Atlantic City, June 17-21, 1990 (new

    attempt * deadline will be known soon and some attempt is being made to raise some
    * during the university school year, and the attempt to make sure that
    * Q: Motion to attempt to fix something, what is being fixed?
    * Visa problems have been reduced from the ICPR attempt. Beijing has a number

    attend * (Haralick) as chair invited everyone to attend and vote, etc. to
    * Motion: (Kak) That the PAMI newsletter to those that attend
    * Proposed to create a short list of US members that attend CVPR,
    * that. The number that attend both is small. Comment about the

    attendance * may reduce the attendance somewhat.
    * The fee should be about $250 with an expected attendance of 300 (200

    attended * #4. Report ICCV 1993 (Huang) (Faugeras) In Berlin, Attended by
    * 60 attended and resulted in a small surplus.
    * Item 4. Motion Workshop. (Brian Schunk) 115 attended, 75 papers
    * members attended the selection meeting. The final total was 89 papers
    * short, 400 attended. Document analysis is fast moving and growing
    * Strong discussion. Joseph Boykin attended to present the Goode award
    6 for attended.

    attendees * Attendees were about evenly divided among members, students, and
    * papers, the papers and attendees are not there. It takes more to

    attendence * We need better information on attendence and conference budget

    attending * Discussion centered on offending others (Europe, the US not attending

    attention * pay attention to the workshop and conference budgets. This also

    attractive * more attractive than San Juan).

    audience * delayed (due to audience members, etc.). Complain to Anil if there

    august * August 1995
    * August 1995, Penn State.
    * A motion (by W. Thompson) to hold the meeting between Mid-June and late August
    * End of August. Really means: Document reognition. Calls for
    * follow the same 4 tracks as 1990. August, The Hague.
    * workshop. IROS is being held in pittsburgh in August (not much
    6 for august.

    austin * Item 6. 3-D Workshop Austin TX, Nov 27-29, 1989. (Anil Jain) The

    authors * are problems. Please to review in a timely manner. Authors should
    * committee to ask authors if they have an overlap in their
    * determine, then the papers are different), can we trust the authors.
    * hard to get reviews to authors. 80% first review in 6 months. 20%
    * Have email addresses for authors. Inform authors of the rules, etc. for
    * PR authors believe that their papers will be treated properly.
    * to the authors, be retained was passed with no opposition.
    8 for authors.

    auto * Is it strong enough? Talk to those involved in Robotics&Auto.

    automatically * with substantially the same material by rejected automatically.

    automation * Robotics and Automation is better now than CS.
    * Robotics and Automation Society left the Computer Society and has 4-5K

    available * a list of available lower cost nearby hotels.
    * Agenda Item #4: ICCV-93. The call for papers was available at CVPR.
    * available too late to be in
    * expanding to a 5th track if space is available. Additional comments
    * ftp.ads.com for access (there are some images already available from
    * in 5 years that all will be available in CDRom, a trend to CDRom.
    * papers are available at CVPR. Mandate related to ICDR, but in the
    * provided at cost (rather than sales prices) if they were available.
    * that are available for tutorials and/or workshops.
    9 for available.

    avi * (Tom Huang, Eric Grimson, Avi Kak, Keith Price)
    * Avi started the discussion by presenting the basic issues:
    * Avi: Currently IEEE CS takes too much money and we do not get much
    * Avi: R and A runs a big one without the support (but only that one).
    * Avi: That we should send a petition to IEEE to form the new
    * Avi: Will draft a petition tonight for sending to IEEE.
    * Called to order at 9:11 EDT by Avi Kak.
    * Chants: AVI AVI AVI AVI ...
    * Establish a committee (Avi) to
    * Huang, Jake Aggarwal, A Rosenfeld, Avi Kak, Herb Freeman. Nominated
    * Item 9. ICCV-3. (Avi Kak) Will be held in Osaka, December 4-7, 1990,
    * The term is over for Avi Kak. The nomination Committee of Tom
    15 for avi.

    avi's * Eric: Move Avi's suggestion:

    avikak * AviKak/Ikeuchi.

    aviv * b. Tel Aviv proposal: Yeshurun, Shashua, Weinshall, Edelman;

    award * for the award. The award is given at most once a year, past recipients include
    * IEEE is the host. ICPR-92 will be in Holland. The first K. S. Fu award
    * II. Award Presentation. Joseph Boykin (IEEE CS VP for CS-Press) presented
    * Strong discussion. Joseph Boykin attended to present the Goode award
    * the Harry Goode award to Azriel Rosenfeld in recogniition of an
    * The Harry Goode Award was created by AFIPS in 1964 and in 1990 when
    * were sent out for determining the Roberts award. There was also some
    8 for award.

    awarded * Agenda Item #3b: Ramesh Jain was awarded his certificate for

    awards * important so that PAMI members are considered for awards, fellows, and
    * Motion by B. Haralick for an Awards committee to consider IEEE Fellows
    * nominations and other awards. Passed.
    * pages, money, awards, etc. So, could we do anything to improve
    * Service awards: We have given them, but we haven't done it lately

    awareness * a lack of awareness of what the TC membership is.

    azriel * Item 5. ICCV2 (Azriel Rosenfeld) The newsletter is a major expense,
    * Item 7. Newsletter. (Azriel Rosenfeld) The mailing is to the North
    * the Harry Goode award to Azriel Rosenfeld in recogniition of an


    Last update:Fri Jul 14 08:58:20 PDT 1995
    Maintained by Keith Price, price@usc.edu
    Comments are welcome (or use email in Netscape, or the above address).