back
* investigating moving it back 1 day (end on Tuesday, Noon).
backlog
* (replacing C. Suen). The backlog has decreased due to the increased
* 1300+ pages per year (from 6 and about 850). The backlog is 85 papers,
* causing some of the backlog. There
* the 18 is not. The current paper backlog for publication is 114 (about
bad
*
* Recognition papers, but the ones submitted were bad.
baird
* editorial board added N. Ahuja (replacing W. Thompson) and H. Baird
bajcsy
* Agenda item #1: R. Bajcsy gave a report on ICCV-II: There were 306 papers
* June 3-7, 1990. R. Bajcsy is the vice-chair. There will be 4 separate
balance
* balance. (Gerson commented on AIPR, heavily industrial.) Discussion
* etc.) A balance of Industry, government and universities. Discussion
* to balance Pattern Recognition and IP. Over the years, Computer
balanced
* on how balanced and the importance to IEEE.
balancing
* processing, VLSI designs) and load balancing between tracks, and
banglore
* Banglore, and Delhi
bank
* registration 15, CS Admin 24, Contigeny 17, Treasureer and bank 5,
banquet
* Breaks 40, Reception 20, Banquet 45, Misc 6.
* selected. The cost is about the same as NYC. The banquet location
base
* Discussions on Image data base, cam PAMI do anything (i.e. add the
* images used in papers to a data base), when to add since the student
based
* #15. Announcement of "Physics-Based Vision Newsletter" (Shafer)
* #7. Upcoming CAD-Based vision (Ikeuchi). 1994, February 8-10 (W-F)
* 3. Workshop on Context based Vision: J Mundy and T Strat June 1995
* 4. 3rd CAD-Based Vision Workshop
*
* A gang of 7 is assembling an all-electronic on physics based vision.
* Agenda item #3: CAD-Based Vision June 2-3: (Linda Shapiro) 69 were
* Agenda Item #6: CAD Based Vision, K. Ikeuchi. Roughly the fall of
* changes based on discussions at this meeting (with regard to conference
* in Japan. He porposed, based on discussions with many people including
* Physics based vision (Shafer). There is space for 3 tracks.
* The selection was based on the results of the blind review process, with
* too high) are based on a formula. For the computer area as a whole,
13 for based.
basic
* (Nevatia) The basic issue is one of size -- PR/CV/IP -- and a
* Avi started the discussion by presenting the basic issues:
became
* a Technical Committee). Software Engineering became a TCouncil, with
because
* because they don't fell that they will get a fair hearing (some
* Budget is larger this year, this year is larger because of meeting
* decision last year. Just because people want it doesn't mean it is
* Eric: We have a larger budget because we made money on CVPR.
* one is at 1K. Advantage is wide circulation because of being
become
* become a society (the officers).
* Discussion of making the move to become a society, we must move to
* get them to become active again. Maybe it needs a separate
* Haralick) It has become the First International Conference on Document
* Ram: Not sure we have the critical mass to become a society, most
been
* Agenda item #3: R. Chellappa gave a report on CVPR-89: 327 papers have been
* Agenda item #4: The PAMI newsletter has been sent out to the full
* Agenda Item #2: CVPR93, Ruud Bolle. The hotel contract has been
* chairs approved last year. The Seattle Westin Hotel has been
* had been expected. The conference should have a small surplus. She
* has been selected. Dates: June 20-24, 1994.
* papers that have been excluded in the past (PR, IP, applications).
* past there has been a Workshop on Computer Vision as an outlet for
* some felt that CVPR had been too narrow and some feel that it is
* submitted and have been sent to the program committee for review, with
* they had been mailed to the entire PAMI journal list or just the US portion
* Visa problems have been reduced from the ICPR attempt. Beijing has a number
12 for been.
before
* (Possible dates, in October 1995; or Week before Thanksgiving.)
* 1991 in Bonn). Saturday before or after CVPR.
* Medioni, S Negahdaripur (November 1995, Miami MTW before
* Question regarding the dates (M-W before Thanksgiving), Gerard is
* The call for papers is out. There are 4 days before and 4 days after
* week before. Finiancial Responsibility with ICPR, this is an
6 for before.
behaviors;
* tutorials (Monday), 3 Workshop planned (Visual Behaviors; Role of Function
behind
* conference chair and it fell behind. Some discussion of the budget
beijing
* a. Beijing proposal: Ma, Huang, Faugeras, Ohta, A. Jain;
* Final: India 55. Beijing 27.
* Visa problems have been reduced from the ICPR attempt. Beijing has a number
being
* At this point a comment about the Agenda of the meeting being a
* A discussion regarding dues for membership in the TC. This is now being
* a year with the IAPR being the bulk of the newsletter. For a while
* being tried.
* committee is being assembled and will meet at the University of
* deadline will be known soon and some attempt is being made to raise some
* decision, 18 months for publication). The 6 months is mostly being met,
* dimensions are being confused (selectivity, topic area,
* list and By-Laws are not being followed.
* one is at 1K. Advantage is wide circulation because of being
* Q: Motion to attempt to fix something, what is being fixed?
* so about 100 papers are expected. Pre-conference tutorials are being
* the cost being covered by the package and library rates).
* workshop. IROS is being held in pittsburgh in August (not much
14 for being.
believe
* PR authors believe that their papers will be treated properly.
below
* both were below 2, it was rejected. The remaining 350 papers were
beome
* From: Continue, negotiate changes, jump ship, or beome society,
berlin
* #4. Report ICCV 1993 (Huang) (Faugeras) In Berlin, Attended by
* Agenda item #9: ICCV93: Berlin (May?): Date not certain (partly due to
* ICCV95 location will be decided at ICCV93 in Berlin in May and that
* May 11-13, 1993 Berlin.
best
*
* directions by drawing on the best few papers for the other meetings
* September is the best season. Airfares are around $1000. (US or Europe)
better
* better than past.
* Robotics and Automation is better now than CS.
* We need better information on attendence and conference budget
* work with IEEE to work on a better arrangement to have greater
between
* #1. CVPR93 (Aggarwal, Aloimonos, Bolle). Between 440 and 450 people
* a meeting (concentrating on the intended difference between ICCV and
* A motion (by W. Thompson) to hold the meeting between Mid-June and late August
* between 1991 and 1992 was cut 40% due to the new formula that ties the
* between San Francisco, Rockies, Pittsburgh, and Boston. Next ICCV
* between the CVPR submission and other submissions, and the general
* can be done between meetings. There is a need for other meetings.
* Motion: (Bill Thompson, seconded K. Bowyer) To choose between Seattle
* processing, VLSI designs) and load balancing between tracks, and
* Q: Some distinguished between context and domain speific (ie
10 for between.
beyond
* and workshops, it is time to grow beyond a TC after 22 years,
bhanu
* #14. CVPR96 Proposal (Bhanu). Proposal to have CVPR 1996 in
* #5. Report on 1992 Applications of Computer Vision (Bhanu). First WS,
* 1992. (Bir Bhanu) Program committee of D. Dyer and M. Herman, J.
* 2. CVPR96: K. Ikeuchi, B. Bhanu, C. Dyer
* 9. CVPR96: K Ikeuchi and B Bhanu, June 1996, San Francisco
* C Dyer/Ikeuchi program chair, Bhanu as general chair.
* ProgChair, Bhanu as General Chair.
* Ranging workshop (Bir Bhanu) on October 9 with 9 presentations, then 4
8 for bhanu.
big
* Avi: R and A runs a big one without the support (but only that one).
bigger
* bigger and have some of what we want. Current relationship is
bill
* Motion: (Bill Thompson) That CVPR be held in the second half of June.
* Motion: (Bill Thompson, seconded K. Bowyer) To choose between Seattle
binford
* Motion: (Tom Binford) That IEEE-PAMI-TC withdraw from IAPR. After
* multiple conferences, a motion: (Tom Binford): The the policy of CVPR
* were poorly considered. (T. Binford) Quality is shown by innovation and
biology
* 7. Shape and Pattern Matching in Computational Biology Workshop:
biomedical
* #10. 1994 Workshop on Multi-Dimensional Biomedical Image Analysis
bir
* 1992. (Bir Bhanu) Program committee of D. Dyer and M. Herman, J.
* Bir: Others spend on student scholarships.
* Bir: We should look at forming a PAMI society.
* Ranging workshop (Bir Bhanu) on October 9 with 9 presentations, then 4
bit
* Issues raised were Technical Council (a bit more freedom than
* signed (Omni Park Central, NYC), the rates will be a bit higher than
blake
* b. Corfu, Greece proposal: Tsotsos, Zucker, Blake
blind
* members and expects to do blind reviews.
* reviewers with blind reviewing. A July 11 meeting will finalize the
* reviewers, but it is not clear is it helped. [Comment on double blind
* similar to ICCV-2 (blind reviews, program committee, etc.), with the
* The selection was based on the results of the blind review process, with
* with the standard blind reviewing process. 28 of the 43 committee
6 for blind.
board
* #3. Governance issues: Proposal for 12 member board (Haralick)
* Board meeting (next week) will propose that PAMI go to 12 issues and
* editorial board added N. Ahuja (replacing W. Thompson) and H. Baird
* executive board (10-12) that would meet and make decisions.
* Executive Board for decision making. History, there was an
* Signal Processing). The Computer Society Board opposed the T-IP
* the US 4 members on the board. Then the discussion started of what
7 for board.
bob
* (Bob Haralick)
* (Bob Haralick, Jake Aggarwal, T. Huang and Jack Sklansky). The proposal
* Agenda item #4: Document Processing Workshop, September 30: (Bob
bobick
* Agenda item #16: New Business: Bobick discussed the Optical Society of
bolle
* R Bolle and
* #1. CVPR93 (Aggarwal, Aloimonos, Bolle). Between 440 and 450 people
* Agenda Item #2: CVPR93, Ruud Bolle. The hotel contract has been
* conferece. In IP, there is none. (Bolle) We tried to get Pattern
bombay
* Bombay, mid-December. In association with other meetings in Bombay,
bonn
* 1991 in Bonn). Saturday before or after CVPR.
boston
* (less than Seattle, Boston, San Francisco). Dorm space is an issue, but
* Admendment that the dates will be held until until Boston in 95.
* between San Francisco, Rockies, Pittsburgh, and Boston. Next ICCV
* Boston.
* in Boston in June 1995.
both
*
* both were below 2, it was rejected. The remaining 350 papers were
* both, CVPR received accepted ECCV titles.)
* is that any papers submitted to both conferences (i.e. CVPR and ICCV)
* meeting, if both reviews gave a 4 or above, the paper was accepted. If
* on-line versions or both.
* something changes)? We don't distinguish, but take both.
* that. The number that attend both is small. Comment about the
* the non-US PAMI members may receive the contents both from their national
9 for both.
boult
* A motion (by T. Boult) to reccomend to the committee that the printed
* Again for Terry Boult for local arrangements.
* Recognition for local arrangements (Terry Boult).
* rejection ratio. (T. Boult) Posters could be submitted as posters.
bound
* bound to mail the newsletter to its members. After discussion
* CD-ROM version and a bound version at the end of each year. Generally
bovik
* proposal due to the large overlap with PAMI. Al Bovik commented that
bowyer
* #6. Status on CVPR94 (Shapiro, Bowyer). Seattle, June 21-23, 4
* 1. CVPR94: K. Bowyer.
* K. Bowyer and D. Goldgof (S. Tanimoto and L. Shapiro program chairs)
* Motion: (Bill Thompson, seconded K. Bowyer) To choose between Seattle
boyer
* list is a mess. Q: (Kim Boyer) not a formal definition, or not an
boykin
* Boykin stated that the CS policy was that proceedings would be
* II. Award Presentation. Joseph Boykin (IEEE CS VP for CS-Press) presented
* Strong discussion. Joseph Boykin attended to present the Goode award
boywer
* Kevin Boywer elected chair.
breadth
* CVPR), the breadth of PAMI, the relation of CVPR to IAPR and ICPR.
break
* abstracting.] Posters are at "Prime" times with a long break for the
* Breaks 40, Reception 20, Banquet 45, Misc 6.
* Discussion that people will break this policy and to make rules
* for later meetings. ICCV-2 was close to break even or a small loss.
brian
* Item 4. Motion Workshop. (Brian Schunk) 115 attended, 75 papers
bring
* chair of the TC, then the EC can bring the membership issue to the
* group to make decisions and bring them to the membership.
* origin of CVPR from PRIP for the purpose to bring in Computer Vision
broad
* broad and to draw in the papers, but good papers must be submitted.
* still too narrow. Open discussion on whether it is broad enough.
broaden
* #2 Discussion (Kak): did we broaden the scope? After the last one
* discussion on what it means to broaden the meeting, but are the
* etc. --- Current motion is only to broaden the meeting. Separate
broader
* (Not friendly, wants to have it broader).
*
brought
* the same time, which brought up the usual long discussed issues of
budget
* 2. 1994 Budget: L. Shapiro
* 2. 1995 Budget: L. Shapiro. The current budget is about $14.8K for 1996 $15K
* Agenda item #12: The budget for 1989 and 1990 is about $12000 each,
* Agenda Item #7: TC Budget and IEEE-CS rules: A Kak. The budget
* Budget is larger this year, this year is larger because of meeting
* budget to last year's surplus (35%) in conferences. We thus need to
* budget to send out a newsletter.
* budget was approved.
* conference chair and it fell behind. Some discussion of the budget
* Eric: We have a larger budget because we made money on CVPR.
* feels that it is important for the next conference to budget for travel
* Issues with the computer society. Initially they wanted to budget
* Patrick: How things have changed? Year ago budget was $4K, now
* The budget allows us to ask for more money (in addition to the
* unknown number of these are students. The original budget projection
* We need better information on attendence and conference budget
18 for budget.
budgeted
* expenses were about $13.4K sinced it was budgeted at 55 people.
budgeting
* the conference numbers are decreasing so the CS requires budgeting
budgets
* pay attention to the workshop and conference budgets. This also
* theory/applied). Are separate tracks separate budgets, proceedings,
build
* IEEE does build in a cushion, so be careful and plan for this.
bulk
* a year with the IAPR being the bulk of the newsletter. For a while
burt
* general chair/ Burt and Flinchbaugh as program chairs).
business
* Agenda item #16: New Business: Bobick discussed the Optical Society of
* Item 13. New business. CVPR 1991 (approximately June). Need
* publication. So an issue of who are the members so that business
but
* (Grimson:) PAMI generates 300K for the CS, but does not get any
* (less than Seattle, Boston, San Francisco). Dorm space is an issue, but
* Agenda item #3: AIPR88: Scheduled for the Cosmos Club in DC, but cannot
* Avi: R and A runs a big one without the support (but only that one).
* broad and to draw in the papers, but good papers must be submitted.
* but it should be NEWS, even if it is only 2 pages and important that
* discussion on what it means to broaden the meeting, but are the
* Discussion: not wanting quotas, but the reviews were done by
* extra money for editing production, but not more pages. In January
* fall, but will be March 1993 in Nashville. Vanderbilt (A. Peters) will
* generated and only had 130 names, but each issue loses more names than
* Hotels run around $100 on the sea front. Proposal was June, but that
* in return, but it requires a lot of work for the people doing it.
* it when to the 10K list, but that is expensive.
* meeting. But there is a 1/2 track for "experimental" papers/tracks.
* open up the process. But we are not keeping track of who comes and
* papers are available at CVPR. Mandate related to ICDR, but in the
* papers are expected, but only 50-60 per track (240 total) will be
* papers this allowed, but there was still strong support for the
* possible to separate. PAMI is sponsored by several societies, but
* Problem is not the mailing list, but the problem is that we don't
* real alternative places to eat, but the hotel may be able to work
* recognition not diluted by others. But expression may enter in.
* Recognition papers, but the ones submitted were bad.
* requirement, but sent to a strange list. An electronic list was
* retain more conference income, but decisions were postponed until the
* reviewers, but it is not clear is it helped. [Comment on double blind
* Service awards: We have given them, but we haven't done it lately
* something changes)? We don't distinguish, but take both.
* surplus. A large part is newsletters, but the editor was
* the agreement that the newsletter would go to all PAMI subscribers, but
* to consider Hawaii, but the east coast is the right cycle. Two
* Week of June 16 Hotel Nikko. (Not signed yet, but that is the
33 for but.
bylaws
* Agenda item #12: Proposed Bylaws, postponed to the meeting at ICCV2, with
* be out in the winter with a CVPR report, updated bylaws, etc. From the