cad
* #7. Upcoming CAD-Based vision (Ikeuchi). 1994, February 8-10 (W-F)
* 4. 3rd CAD-Based Vision Workshop
* Agenda item #3: CAD-Based Vision June 2-3: (Linda Shapiro) 69 were
* Agenda Item #6: CAD Based Vision, K. Ikeuchi. Roughly the fall of
caia
* Agenda item #7: CAIA (R. Haralick): CAIA is now run at the
* Computer Society level rather than the PAMI-TC level. CAIA-89 may have
califano
* A. Califano (Motion to make annual)
california
* California (San Francisco) (return from 1995). Dyer/Ikeuchi as
* third Computer Vision meeting in 2.5 months, all in California, and this
call
* Motion: (Haralick) Specifically call out Image Processing and its subtopics
* Agenda Item #4: ICCV-93. The call for papers was available at CVPR.
* Champaign ($109 per night). The call for papers is on the CVPR92
* current call includes a requirement for stating the differences
* discussion of the distribution by the Computer Society of the call for
* Discussion on paper topics not mentioned in the call (e.g. medical image
* Duplicate submissions -- policy is stated on the call for papers for
* in the next Call for papers (94).
* Program Comm: 40; Office 22, Advance program 22, call for papers
* requirement for new unpublished work already stated in the call for
* the call for papers is already out, what it real means, how much
* The Call for Papers is out. The meeting is single track, planning for
* The call for papers is out. There are 4 days before and 4 days after
13 for call.
called
* Called to order at 9:11 EDT by Avi Kak.
* Meeting called to order at 8:36PM. 41 members signed in.
* Meeting called to order at 9:10PM. 79 members signed in.
* Meeting called to order, by Linda Shapiro at 8:10
* On CVPR94, the area of Image Processing is not called out.
calls
* End of August. Really means: Document reognition. Calls for
cam
* Discussions on Image data base, cam PAMI do anything (i.e. add the
came
* multiple. Robotics came from several societies rather than CS.
camps
* O. Camps, P. Flynn, G. Stockman (June 1996).
can
* can be done between meetings. There is a need for other meetings.
* Can we take the journal? Threaten to pull out and see what happens.
* can you tell if it is different (e.g. if it requires effort to
* chair of the TC, then the EC can bring the membership issue to the
* determine, then the papers are different), can we trust the authors.
* interest, can convert it to HTML. A discussion regarding paper or
* makes money can we get any? No. Journals have nothing to do with
* money so that most of the program committee can meet. The
* Q: Motion can lead to many papers? Still struggling over how to get
* question of whether one conference can handle all of them is another
* Tanimoto comment, there are many things that can be done and are
* who is a member and who can vote. IEEE does not regard this as a
12 for can.
cancun
* Cancun: few.
* choices to consider are US Virgin Islands and Cancun (Mexico)
cannot
* Agenda item #3: AIPR88: Scheduled for the Cosmos Club in DC, but cannot
careful
* IEEE does build in a cushion, so be careful and plan for this.
carried
* Vote on Amended motion: Carried.
* Vote Carried.
* Vote: Carried.
* Vote: Carried.
* Vote: Carried.
* Vote: Carried.
* Carried by acclimation.
* Motion (TC chair is one of the delegates) carried, no opposition.
* motion carried.
9 for carried.
carries
* Carries by acclamation.
* Vote: Carries.
category
* US is a category C, (needs 800 members). With smaller number dues
causing
* causing some of the backlog. There
cdrom
* in 5 years that all will be available in CDRom, a trend to CDRom.
center
* We are almost a society now, the intellectual center is not
centered
* centered on the need for more industrial involvement, and on the
* Discussion centered on determining differences, who is responsible for
* Discussion centered on how it would be interpreted, the
* Discussion centered on how such a policy would be distributed since
* Discussion centered on offending others (Europe, the US not attending
centers
* an research centers. Deemed to be a success. There was a meeting
central
* signed (Omni Park Central, NYC), the rates will be a bit higher than
certain
* Agenda item #9: ICCV93: Berlin (May?): Date not certain (partly due to
certificate
* Agenda Item #3b: Ramesh Jain was awarded his certificate for
chair
* #16. Election of a new PAMI-TC chair (Huang).
* (Haralick) as chair invited everyone to attend and vote, etc. to
* (Miami). (Tom Huang, General Chair). Two tracks, one on Motion on
* 7:00 Linda Shapiro Chair.
* Agenda item #15: New Chair: T. Huang's term ends July 30. A committee
* amount of paper the program chair needs to handle and mail out.
* C Dyer/Ikeuchi program chair, Bhanu as general chair.
* chair of the TC, then the EC can bring the membership issue to the
* chairs approved last year. The Seattle Westin Hotel has been
* conference chair and it fell behind. Some discussion of the budget
* content. T Huang General Chair. Negahdaripur local.
* Discussion: the TC chair appoints all delegates, with nominal renewal every
* final decisions by the program co-chairs (Tsuji, Olaf, and Kak), they
* from Europe as the program chairs. [Y. Shirai reported that the assignment
* from Japan). The program committee totals 34 people (3 program chairs,
* general chair, and Profs. Tsuji and Kak plus a third person (not yet
* general chair/ Burt and Flinchbaugh as program chairs).
* Goldgof/Medioni program chair. (PC about 30 people).
* is that the TC chair be a permanant delegate.
* J. Aloimonos (J. Aggarwal chair) proposed the NorthEast with industry
* June 3-7, 1990. R. Bajcsy is the vice-chair. There will be 4 separate
* K. Bowyer and D. Goldgof (S. Tanimoto and L. Shapiro program chairs)
* Kevin Boywer elected chair.
* Motion (TC chair is one of the delegates) carried, no opposition.
* next chair of the PAMI TC.
* of either program chair or general chair to Nagao and Tsuji should
* possible dates, co-chairs, and possible program committee members.
* pressures on the program chairs to add papers.
* ProgChair, Bhanu as General Chair.
* recommendation of the current chair. T. Huang will be proposed as the
* service as the past chair. The appointed officers were announced:
* the chairs as indicated above.
* the fall of 1990 with someone from Japan as a co-chair, and add 7 more
* to be held in December 1989 with Anil Jain as the general chair. This
* Treasurer: Jake Aggarwal, Secretary: Keith Price, Vice-Chair: Eric
* VI. Election of the TC Chair
* visce chairs from different countries.
40 for chair.
champaign
* after 5 meetings in cities (well Champaign-Urbana). Several things
* Champaign ($109 per night). The call for papers is on the CVPR92
* Champaign, Ill -- CVPR92
chance
* (And said the chance of this happening is very low)
change
* (Haralick) Motion: Change the name of the conference to Computer
*
* change depending on the location of the conference.] The proposal
* regarding the sudden change in ICPR from most submitted papers to
* was tabled by a vote of Yes (to table) 16, No 11, Abstain 14. Thus, no change
changed
* CVPR has changed its flavor, so that many do not send papers here
* expanded and changed a little. Student housing is at Columbia
* new Transactions on Image Processing (ASSP has changed its name to
* Patrick: How things have changed? Year ago budget was $4K, now
changes
* changes based on discussions at this meeting (with regard to conference
* Changes made in the executive committee (Section 3.2) were removal after
* changes, control of conferences, and possible TAB actions regarding the
* for possible changes.
* From: Continue, negotiate changes, jump ship, or beome society,
* something changes)? We don't distinguish, but take both.
* the last TC newsletter. Several minor changes were made at the meeting.
* with changes.
8 for changes.
chants
* Chants: AVI AVI AVI AVI ...
character
* Anaysis. Character recognition, engineering drawings, and music are the
characterization
* Agenda item #11a: Performance Characterization of Vision Algorithms
* Performance characterization issues, analyze problem of numerical
charge
* (TC) and good mailing list (PAMI). IEEE-CS charges about $2.00 per
* allowed by the Computer Society. The question is wheather to charge
* page (with the provision that the excess page charge will be paid
* them, how much to charge, what would they provide, what services would
charging
* charging for extra pages (money goes to program committee). Discuss
cheaper
* (which is cheaper to stay and get to). Puerto Rico? (St Thomas is
* Mention: Key West is cheaper (Miami)?
* out a cheaper meal alternative. Airfare is $400-500 (with no Saturday
* some as low as $45. Osaka is considerably cheaper than Tokyo. The
* there are cheaper nearby hotels. Meal costs are a larger issue -- no
cheating
* more cheating by not stating that the paper is the same, that the
chellappa
* Agenda item #3: R. Chellappa gave a report on CVPR-89: 327 papers have been
* Agenda item #6: CVPR89 (R. Chellappa): At the Sheraton Grand
* Item 3. CVPR89. (Rama Chellappa) 330+ registered, thanks to John
china
* China, 230 accepted + 110 posters + 15 invited papers (40 from China).
* with China. H. Freeman discussed the organizing problems. About 680
choices
* choices to consider are US Virgin Islands and Cancun (Mexico)
choose
* 15 meeting in Dallas of the program committee will choose the final
* Motion: (Bill Thompson, seconded K. Bowyer) To choose between Seattle
circulated
* Presented his petition, circulated on Wednesday and Thursday.
circulation
* one is at 1K. Advantage is wide circulation because of being
citation
* in <3 months. A citation analysis and impact report (by IEEE for all
cities
* after 5 meetings in cities (well Champaign-Urbana). Several things
city
* Agenda item #7: H. Freeman reported that ICPR will be held in Atlantic City on
* Item 8. ICPR. (Jake Aggarwal) Atlantic City, June 17-21, 1990 (new
* PAMI TC Meeting of June 15, 1993. New York City.
claim
* are added. We currently claim >1000 members for the IAPR which gives
clairfy
* Item 8 to clairfy the context of the motion.
clarification
* Clarification that IAPR newsletter must be sent to the US community.
classification
* classification, stocastic, ...). One role of prog. comm. is to be
clear
* organization itself. At the moment it is not clear that we do not
* reviewers, but it is not clear is it helped. [Comment on double blind
close
* for later meetings. ICCV-2 was close to break even or a small loss.
* Further discussion included why the meeting was scheduled so close to
club
* Agenda item #3: AIPR88: Scheduled for the Cosmos Club in DC, but cannot
* Club is going to vote as to admitting women as members.
cmu
* at CMU (one of the 10 highest at CMU 500 per week -- send mail to
* Steve Shafer at CMU).
coast
* restrictions) from the East Coast. Access is through Miami or San Juan.
* some discussion of a West Coast location, with no other suggestions at
* to consider Hawaii, but the east coast is the right cycle. Two
columbia
* expanded and changed a little. Student housing is at Columbia
com
* ftp.ads.com for access (there are some images already available from
combined
* be combined into the PAMI newsletter (one mailing). Thus,
come
* it comes to you.
* open up the process. But we are not keeping track of who comes and
* Q: Limits on PAMI pages? Really come from total subscriptions.
* the 3 reviews, 2 come quickly, the third takes time.
* the reviewers come from more than the program committee and that it need
* votes among the membership by mail and not just who comes to the
6 for come.
comm
* Motion: That the program committee reconsider that the Prog Comm
* classification, stocastic, ...). One role of prog. comm. is to be
* Program Comm: 40; Office 22, Advance program 22, call for papers
comment
* At this point a comment about the Agenda of the meeting being a
* Comment on earlier motion, that CS will not like the idea that PAMI
* Comment that no Pattern Recognition in 1995.
* Comment that posters had 2 pages -- that was low. Possible same
* Comment that the TC list should be updated and maintained.
* Comment: (Freeman) Point missed, did this group want to have an
* Freeman comment there is not a CVPR95.
* program, it requires a comment on other submissions. The program
* reviewers, but it is not clear is it helped. [Comment on double blind
* Tanimoto comment, there are many things that can be done and are
* that. The number that attend both is small. Comment about the
11 for comment.
commentary
* Open question is whether there is running commentary (currently no).
commented
* balance. (Gerson commented on AIPR, heavily industrial.) Discussion
* commented that the TC keeps a portion of any conference surplus with an
* proposal due to the large overlap with PAMI. Al Bovik commented that
comments
* (LShapiro) Comments on next progComm.
*
* Comments were duly noted by the organizers.
* Comments: (J Mundy) Reminded that some past meetings with weak reviews
* expanding to a 5th track if space is available. Additional comments
* guidelines and other TC officers). Send any comments to E. Kent.
* Notes for future committees and comments:
7 for comments.
commit
* Steve: afraid that the number that would commit to the time is low.
committee
* IEEE Computer Society PAMI Technical Committee Meeting
* (CS-Press), which has helped publication. There is a CS committee
* 15 meeting in Dallas of the program committee will choose the final
* 1992. (Bir Bhanu) Program committee of D. Dyer and M. Herman, J.
* Motion: That the program committee reconsider that the Prog Comm
*
* A motion (by T. Boult) to reccomend to the committee that the printed
* a Technical Committee). Software Engineering became a TCouncil, with
* Agenda item #15: New Chair: T. Huang's term ends July 30. A committee
* Aggarwal and A. Rosenfeld) on June 5. The program committee has 20
* Changes made in the executive committee (Section 3.2) were removal after
* charging for extra pages (money goes to program committee). Discuss
* committee is being assembled and will meet at the University of
* committee of 50 people. Try to add other workshops around ICCV, if
* committee to ask authors if they have an overlap in their
* control the program committee should have, whether it would lead to
* convey the intent of the TC to the program committee.
* Establish a committee (Avi) to
* Establish an executive committee of 12 appointed by the
* for Saturday. Publicize the names of the program committee!
* from Japan). The program committee totals 34 people (3 program chairs,
* least one from the program committee. In the January Program Committee
* many of the current program committee members: hold ICCV-III in Japan,
* Maryland in January. Rather than the entire committee (due to the
* money so that most of the program committee can meet. The
* Motion by B. Haralick for an Awards committee to consider IEEE Fellows
* night). 98 papers and 45 posters. 22 committee members were at the LA
* Notes for future committees and comments:
* of the technical committee.
* other committees. The
* papers submitted, 2 program committee reviewers, L. Davis, R. Jain and
* possible dates, co-chairs, and possible program committee members.
* program committee, with a small intersection with the previous year, and
* reviewers are used (more than the committee) for 311 papers, 197 US, 23
* similar to ICCV-2 (blind reviews, program committee, etc.), with the
* Some suggestion (from IEEE-CS) to have an executive committee and
* Steering Committee: TSHuang, APentland, PStucki, sponsored by
* submitted and have been sent to the program committee for review, with
* that a reasonable fraction of the committee meet to decide on the
* The agenda so far for the June PAMI Technical Committee Meeting
* the IAPR executive committee
* The result of the discussion is that the executive committee of the PAMI
* the reviewers come from more than the program committee and that it need
* The term is over for Avi Kak. The nomination Committee of Tom
* to the possible program committee list.
* with the standard blind reviewing process. 28 of the 43 committee
47 for committee.
common
* J. Mundy discussed 2 projects in a Common IU environment sponsored by
community
* Clarification that IAPR newsletter must be sent to the US community.
* input from the PAMI community.
comparable
* are comparable to past meetings. He also observed that this is the
compared
* meeting of the PAMI TC membership when compared to the PAMI journal
complain
* delayed (due to audience members, etc.). Complain to Anil if there
computational
* 7. Shape and Pattern Matching in Computational Biology Workshop:
computer
* IEEE Computer Society PAMI Technical Committee Meeting
* #12. Proposal for a second Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (Dyer).
* #5. Report on 1992 Applications of Computer Vision (Bhanu). First WS,
* (AK:) should be sessions on Computer Vision and Image Processing and
* (Haralick) Motion: Change the name of the conference to Computer
* 1. International Symposium on Computer Vision
* 3. PAMI Page in Computer Magazine: L. Shapiro
* 8. Workshop on Computer Vision (Visual Motion): D. Goldgof, G.
* AFIPS dissolved, the IEEE-Computer Society assumed responsibility
* Agenda item #11: Workshop on Computer Vision Applications: December 2-4,
* allowed by the Computer Society. The question is wheather to charge
* and computer vision.
* Computer Society level rather than the PAMI-TC level. CAIA-89 may have
* Computer Vision and document analysis. (Haralick) perspective on
* dates). There are 4 distinct tracks: Computer Architecture, Signal
* discussion of the distribution by the Computer Society of the call for
* IEEE Computer will feature 1 or 2 TCs each issue. PAMI will appear in
* in San Diego, June 6-8 with an AI and Computer vision Workshop (J.
* Issues with the computer society. Initially they wanted to budget
* origin of CVPR from PRIP for the purpose to bring in Computer Vision
* past there has been a Workshop on Computer Vision as an outlet for
* Processing Society (Dave Munson) approached the Computer Society about a
* Processing, Pattern Recognition Systems, and Computer Vision. A lot of
* program. There is a possible Human-Computer Vision workshop on the
* review time. Spring 1992 issue on Computer Vision and Computer
* Robotics and Automation Society left the Computer Society and has 4-5K
* Signal Processing). The Computer Society Board opposed the T-IP
* solely the Computer Society, Active group with several conferences
* The office is filled by the IEEE Computer Society president on the
* third Computer Vision meeting in 2.5 months, all in California, and this
* to balance Pattern Recognition and IP. Over the years, Computer
* too high) are based on a formula. For the computer area as a whole,
* Vision and Graphics, Learning in Computer Vision. There are new
* Vision has increased to the point where Computer Vision dominates
35 for computer.
concentrating
* a meeting (concentrating on the intended difference between ICCV and
concern
* Concerns regarding the cost were addressed. The hotel is $120 in 1997
* disscussion indicated some concern in the international representation
* Huang) This issue grows from concerns about the different meetings
conferece
* conferece. In IP, there is none. (Bolle) We tried to get Pattern
conference
* (Freeman) Cultural problem, once a conference doesn't have some
* (Haralick) Motion: Change the name of the conference to Computer
* 2. 2nd Document Analysis and Recognitin Conference: R. Haralick
* 4. Third International Conference on Document Analysis and
* 400 people on the conference lists that were not on the TC list were contacted
* 5. Fourth International Conference of Document Analysis and
*
*
*
*
* Agenda item #13: Conference guidelines (R. Haralick): Discussion of the
* budget to last year's surplus (35%) in conferences. We thus need to
* change depending on the location of the conference.] The proposal
* changes based on discussions at this meeting (with regard to conference
* changes, control of conferences, and possible TAB actions regarding the
* commented that the TC keeps a portion of any conference surplus with an
* conference chair and it fell behind. Some discussion of the budget
* conference or separate track to make such papers be submitted.
* conference) is in Singapore in 1995 and probably in Korea in 1997.
* conference, upstairs rooms are HOT. (L. Davis): about 270
* conference. An issue is who is a member? and a structure of a
* conferences (each single track) run in parallel. IAPR is the sponsor,
* conferences is a terrible idea -- applications drive CV. More
* conferences, whether the TC should dictate conference format, and how to
* discussion of the lack of "AI" in PAMI, AI related conferences, name
* discussion of worry and how to deal with overlap of other conferences
* equivalent papers were rejected on the grounds of prior conference
* feasible, discussions on international conferences should be held at
* feels that it is important for the next conference to budget for travel
* had been expected. The conference should have a small surplus. She
* Haralick) It has become the First International Conference on Document
* In 1995 there is only 1 major conference, so proposed to have a CV
* in the conference and in
* initial filtering. Discussions included the nature of the conference,
* international conferences. Passed Yes: 11, No: 9, Abstain: 7.
* is that any papers submitted to both conferences (i.e. CVPR and ICCV)
* Item 12. Discussion of standards for papers, and conferences. (Tom
* leaves. (Get 35% of profit of the conference only.) (AJ:) It is
* multiple conferences, a motion: (Tom Binford): The the policy of CVPR
* Notification will be June 17. The conference generated a motion
* of conference facilities, each with a range of hotels from $25-$100.
* of the "Pami TC" at the conference and the next ICCV conference
* or the other conference.
* papers weakens the conference.
* pay attention to the workshop and conference budgets. This also
* proposal to have guidelines for major conferences, including the nature,
* question of whether one conference can handle all of them is another
* recognition, all in one place. This gives a conference ranging from AI
* retain more conference income, but decisions were postponed until the
* scheduling and the problems of multiple conferences in the same year
* so about 100 papers are expected. Pre-conference tutorials are being
* solely the Computer Society, Active group with several conferences
* TC will prepare a proposal regarding conferences that addresses these
* The conference fees (which were considered
* The conference has (currently) about 250 students, 230-250 members,
* the conference numbers are decreasing so the CS requires budgeting
* the conference.
* there are not the other conferences that make tons of money.
* there is an annual conference in roughly late June in the US (or North
* to fund additional pages in a transactions from a conference.
* want Pattern Recognition papers or not. Image Processing has a new conference. Issue is whether
* was requested. The allocation is 1/3 of the conference surplus plus some more
* We need better information on attendence and conference budget
* whether one month or 6 months apart, travel to major conferences
66 for conference.
conflict
* (due to conflicts with schools on the quarter system).
* desire not to conflict with CVPR93).
* Discussion on dates of ICCV/CVPR and conflicts
* is a conflict and will be shifted.
confused
* dimensions are being confused (selectivity, topic area,
conjunction
* conjunction with CVPR93 (Sunday/Monday). This is a follow up to a
connections
* Rooms range from $15-$150, with the University connections. ACCV (Asian
consider
* choices to consider are US Virgin Islands and Cancun (Mexico)
* For future meeting, if this is done, consider offering an extra
* Item 11. No admendments to consider.
* Motion by A. Rosenfeld (W. Martin second) to consider Item #13 next.
* Motion by B. Haralick for an Awards committee to consider IEEE Fellows
* on Thursday to consider the proposals.]
* papers, and working groups to consider issues.
* to consider Hawaii, but the east coast is the right cycle. Two
* You remember the Hawaii meeting and we could consider some resort
9 for consider.
considerably
* some as low as $45. Osaka is considerably cheaper than Tokyo. The
considered
* important so that PAMI members are considered for awards, fellows, and
* The conference fees (which were considered
* were poorly considered. (T. Binford) Quality is shown by innovation and
considering
* Considering a workshop on Purposive Vision (Aloimonos and Rosenfeld).
constant
* Pages will remain constant over the near term.
contacted
* 400 people on the conference lists that were not on the TC list were contacted
content
* content. T Huang General Chair. Negahdaripur local.
* the non-US PAMI members may receive the contents both from their national
context
* 3. Workshop on Context based Vision: J Mundy and T Strat June 1995
* Item 8 to clairfy the context of the motion.
* Q: Some distinguished between context and domain speific (ie
* Radius where context is used. Time Tied to ICCV.
* the correct definition of Context.
contigeny
* registration 15, CS Admin 24, Contigeny 17, Treasureer and bank 5,
continuation
* Agenda Item #9: The PAMI Newsletter, A. Rosenfeld. (Continuation of
continue
* 70 people, desire for the meeting to continue. 90 submissions, 2 on
* Agenda Item #3: CVPR94, Linda Shapiro. The plans continue with the
* From: Continue, negotiate changes, jump ship, or beome society,
continued
* continued. With possibly different alternatives for the future of
contract
* Agenda Item #2: CVPR93, Ruud Bolle. The hotel contract has been
contribution
* contributions to the fields of pattern recognition, image processing,
* outstanding contribution to the information processing field for fundamental
control
* changes, control of conferences, and possible TAB actions regarding the
* control over its income, its mailing list, its activities (including
* control the program committee should have, whether it would lead to
* Eric G: Herb hit the issue, control over our fate in addition to
* pages in final form. This reduces the lag time and controls the
convert
* interest, can convert it to HTML. A discussion regarding paper or
convey
* convey the intent of the TC to the program committee.
cooperate
* Univ of Zurich with PAMI TC as cooperate.
copies
* 20 associate editors, about 10,000 copies of each issue, $24/year for
* And the problem of getting more than the original 550 copies
* publish 300 library copies. Profit from PAMI is 300K goes to
* Q: Re IEEE sponsored vs private journal? PAMI 10K copies, no other
core
* with 100K members, about 150 core volunteers, and 10-15K other
corfu
* b. Corfu, Greece proposal: Tsotsos, Zucker, Blake
correct
* the correct definition of Context.
cosmos
* Agenda item #3: AIPR88: Scheduled for the Cosmos Club in DC, but cannot
* be held there under IEEE-CS. It is now sponsored by SPIE and the Cosmos
cost
* a list of available lower cost nearby hotels.
* Concerns regarding the cost were addressed. The hotel is $120 in 1997
* covered the cost. The prposal is to have another on next year (CVPR
* Discussion of the hotel costs, and possible dorm accomodations, and
* mailing costs dominate at about $8K to $10K each. The IAPR newsletter
* non-US participants failed to receive the newsletter. The mailings cost about
* of us want to to be with IEEE, to have low cost journal. Maybe
* of the proceedings, Eric was told that any more would cost
* Physical mailing list (TC, Transactions). Issues of cost.
* provided at cost (rather than sales prices) if they were available.
* raised the issue of the $1500 dues we pay to IAPR and the cost of
* selected. The cost is about the same as NYC. The banquet location
* the cost being covered by the package and library rates).
* there are cheaper nearby hotels. Meal costs are a larger issue -- no
* within IEEE, and the low cost. Private publishers are happy to
15 for cost.
could
* pages, money, awards, etc. So, could we do anything to improve
* rejection ratio. (T. Boult) Posters could be submitted as posters.
* You remember the Hawaii meeting and we could consider some resort
council
* Issues raised were Technical Council (a bit more freedom than
count
* First count: Seattle: 22. NY: 22.
* page count (from 900 to 1350) and is now at about 1 issue. Proposals
* Passed: (Overwhelming, no exact count taken).
* Second count: Seattle: 23. NY: 24.
countires
* etc. (from 20 countires). The pattern is similar to ICCV87. Sent to 3
countries
* and 100 members (around 600 registered so far). From 24 countries and
* papers submitted from 26 countries, 270 from
* visce chairs from different countries.
cover
* Critical Mass for a society. Dues enough to cover expenses/.
covered
* areas covered, etc. A discussion of how to deal with these and how to
* covered the cost. The prposal is to have another on next year (CVPR
* the cost being covered by the package and library rates).
covering
* with most of the money covering the newsletter and the rest for travel
crazy
* (Rosenfeld) Newsletter was discussed earlier, crazy mailing list
create
* Proposed to create a short list of US members that attend CVPR,
created
* Amendment that email list be created and a separate non-email.
* The Harry Goode Award was created by AFIPS in 1964 and in 1990 when
criteria
*
critical
* Critical Mass for a society. Dues enough to cover expenses/.
* Ram: Not sure we have the critical mass to become a society, most
crowley
* a. Annecy, France (near Grenoble) proposal: Mohr, Horaud, Crowley
crucial
* A: When crucial decisions need to be made must be made by the
cultural
* (Freeman) Cultural problem, once a conference doesn't have some
current
* 2. 1995 Budget: L. Shapiro. The current budget is about $14.8K for 1996 $15K
* Agenda item #5: The current distribution of the IAPR newsletter will
* Move to Amend to ask the current 4 members of the TC to go to
*
* A motion (by E. Grimson) that the current format, with written reviews returned
* Agenda item #2: CVPR91: Current registration at about 290.
* bigger and have some of what we want. Current relationship is
* current call includes a requirement for stating the differences
* current entire membership and to establish how the 12 would then be
* current limit on funds in a TC account is $30,000 at one time. The
* Current motion is an EC, which is a good thing that is willing to
* etc. --- Current motion is only to broaden the meeting. Separate
* many of the current program committee members: hold ICCV-III in Japan,
* Q: Membership size (current 800), add this time 200 people. CS
* recommendation of the current chair. T. Huang will be proposed as the
* the 18 is not. The current paper backlog for publication is 114 (about
* the PAMI-TC home page. Current membership is 1224, US 864, foreign 360.
17 for current.
currently
* acceptance rate is currently less than T-PAMI and the review is so much
* are added. We currently claim >1000 members for the IAPR which gives
* Avi: Currently IEEE CS takes too much money and we do not get much
* Graphics, Probabilistic Reasoning. Currently about 1 paper per day. Of
* Open question is whether there is running commentary (currently no).
* Sizes PAMI currently 1200 (with no dues), R&A is 7000, CS is 100K.
* TC is responsible to mail out the IPAR newsletter. Currently twice
* The conference has (currently) about 250 students, 230-250 members,
* The TC is the US member group of IAPR with currently 4 delegates
9 for currently.
cushion
* IEEE does build in a cushion, so be careful and plan for this.
cut
* between 1991 and 1992 was cut 40% due to the new formula that ties the
cvpr
* #14. CVPR96 Proposal (Bhanu). Proposal to have CVPR 1996 in
* (CVPR, European CV, workshops, etc.).
* (Goldgof, Acharya) Friday after CVPR. Q: on name multiple sensors
* 1991 in Bonn). Saturday before or after CVPR.
* 3. CVPR 97. R Nevatia. Discussing 1997 seems early.
* 9. Double Submissions (CVPR, ICCV, etc). Little discussion, except that
* Agenda item #3: R. Chellappa gave a report on CVPR-89: 327 papers have been
* Agenda item #9: No CVPR in 1990.
* Motion: to have a separate track CVPR to encourage submission of
*
* Agenda Item #4: ICCV-93. The call for papers was available at CVPR.
* Agenda item #8: CVPR 1992, June 15-20, Urbana IL. (N. Ahuja):
* be out in the winter with a CVPR report, updated bylaws, etc. From the
* between the CVPR submission and other submissions, and the general
* both, CVPR received accepted ECCV titles.)
* covered the cost. The prposal is to have another on next year (CVPR
* CVPR has changed its flavor, so that many do not send papers here
* CVPR money: $325.
* CVPR), possible locations
* CVPR), the breadth of PAMI, the relation of CVPR to IAPR and ICPR.
* CVPR, etc., publish in the journal over the past 4 years.
* Discussion on dates of ICCV/CVPR and conflicts
* Eric: We have a larger budget because we made money on CVPR.
* Formal motion that CVPR 97 that the USC group is is willing to do
* in 1994. Planned for June 20-21 (after CVPR) 1996, with a
* is that any papers submitted to both conferences (i.e. CVPR and ICCV)
* Item 13. New business. CVPR 1991 (approximately June). Need
* Motion: (Bill Thompson) That CVPR be held in the second half of June.
* multiple conferences, a motion: (Tom Binford): The the policy of CVPR
* Negahdaripur, Goldgof). 1995, there is no CVPR, no ICPR, ... in the
* of CVPR-89 and adjourned at 10:30.
* origin of CVPR from PRIP for the purpose to bring in Computer Vision
* papers are available at CVPR. Mandate related to ICDR, but in the
* prices), e.g. one package is CVPR, another is CVPR+xxx, etc.
* Proposed to create a short list of US members that attend CVPR,
* some felt that CVPR had been too narrow and some feel that it is
* support other meetings. CVPR generates maybe 10K surplus. Today
* This follows the successful workshop in Maui (CVPR 91) and
40 for cvpr.
cvpr88
* Agenda item #1: CVPR88 (R. Jain): About 350 at the
cvpr89
* Agenda item #6: CVPR89 (R. Chellappa): At the Sheraton Grand
* Item 3. CVPR89. (Rama Chellappa) 330+ registered, thanks to John
cvpr91
* Agenda item #2: CVPR91: Current registration at about 290.
cvpr92
* Agenda Item #1: CVPR92, Narendra Ahuja. There were 357 submissions,
* Champaign ($109 per night). The call for papers is on the CVPR92
* Champaign, Ill -- CVPR92
cvpr93
* #1. CVPR93 (Aggarwal, Aloimonos, Bolle). Between 440 and 450 people
* Agenda item #10: CVPR93 Proposals and discussion:
* Agenda Item #2: CVPR93, Ruud Bolle. The hotel contract has been
* conjunction with CVPR93 (Sunday/Monday). This is a follow up to a
* desire not to conflict with CVPR93).
cvpr94
* #6. Status on CVPR94 (Shapiro, Bowyer). Seattle, June 21-23, 4
* 1. CVPR94: K. Bowyer.
* Agenda Item #3: CVPR94, Linda Shapiro. The plans continue with the
* CVPR94.
* On CVPR94, the area of Image Processing is not called out.
cvpr95
* Freeman comment there is not a CVPR95.
cvpr96
* #14. CVPR96 Proposal (Bhanu). Proposal to have CVPR 1996 in
* 2. CVPR96: K. Ikeuchi, B. Bhanu, C. Dyer
* 9. CVPR96: K Ikeuchi and B Bhanu, June 1996, San Francisco
cvpr97
* 3. CVPR97: R. Nevatia
cycle
* to consider Hawaii, but the east coast is the right cycle. Two
cynicism
* cynicism that rejection means the paper is good). Issue of