cad * #7. Upcoming CAD-Based vision (Ikeuchi). 1994, February 8-10 (W-F)
* 4. 3rd CAD-Based Vision Workshop
* Agenda item #3: CAD-Based Vision June 2-3: (Linda Shapiro) 69 were
* Agenda Item #6: CAD Based Vision, K. Ikeuchi. Roughly the fall of

caia * Agenda item #7: CAIA (R. Haralick): CAIA is now run at the
* Computer Society level rather than the PAMI-TC level. CAIA-89 may have

califano * A. Califano (Motion to make annual)

california * California (San Francisco) (return from 1995). Dyer/Ikeuchi as
* third Computer Vision meeting in 2.5 months, all in California, and this

call * Motion: (Haralick) Specifically call out Image Processing and its subtopics
* Agenda Item #4: ICCV-93. The call for papers was available at CVPR.
* Champaign ($109 per night). The call for papers is on the CVPR92
* current call includes a requirement for stating the differences
* discussion of the distribution by the Computer Society of the call for
* Discussion on paper topics not mentioned in the call (e.g. medical image
* Duplicate submissions -- policy is stated on the call for papers for
* in the next Call for papers (94).
* Program Comm: 40; Office 22, Advance program 22, call for papers
* requirement for new unpublished work already stated in the call for
* the call for papers is already out, what it real means, how much
* The Call for Papers is out. The meeting is single track, planning for
* The call for papers is out. There are 4 days before and 4 days after
13 for call.

called * Called to order at 9:11 EDT by Avi Kak.
* Meeting called to order at 8:36PM. 41 members signed in.
* Meeting called to order at 9:10PM. 79 members signed in.
* Meeting called to order, by Linda Shapiro at 8:10
* On CVPR94, the area of Image Processing is not called out.

calls * End of August. Really means: Document reognition. Calls for

cam * Discussions on Image data base, cam PAMI do anything (i.e. add the

came * multiple. Robotics came from several societies rather than CS.

camps * O. Camps, P. Flynn, G. Stockman (June 1996).

can * can be done between meetings. There is a need for other meetings.
* Can we take the journal? Threaten to pull out and see what happens.
* can you tell if it is different (e.g. if it requires effort to
* chair of the TC, then the EC can bring the membership issue to the
* determine, then the papers are different), can we trust the authors.
* interest, can convert it to HTML. A discussion regarding paper or
* makes money can we get any? No. Journals have nothing to do with
* money so that most of the program committee can meet. The
* Q: Motion can lead to many papers? Still struggling over how to get
* question of whether one conference can handle all of them is another
* Tanimoto comment, there are many things that can be done and are
* who is a member and who can vote. IEEE does not regard this as a
12 for can.

cancun * Cancun: few.
* choices to consider are US Virgin Islands and Cancun (Mexico)

cannot * Agenda item #3: AIPR88: Scheduled for the Cosmos Club in DC, but cannot

careful * IEEE does build in a cushion, so be careful and plan for this.

carried * Vote on Amended motion: Carried.
* Vote Carried.
* Vote: Carried.
* Vote: Carried.
* Vote: Carried.
* Vote: Carried.
* Carried by acclimation.
* Motion (TC chair is one of the delegates) carried, no opposition.
* motion carried.
9 for carried.

carries * Carries by acclamation.
* Vote: Carries.

category * US is a category C, (needs 800 members). With smaller number dues

causing * causing some of the backlog. There

cdn * CDN,

cdrom * in 5 years that all will be available in CDRom, a trend to CDRom.

center * We are almost a society now, the intellectual center is not

centered * centered on the need for more industrial involvement, and on the
* Discussion centered on determining differences, who is responsible for
* Discussion centered on how it would be interpreted, the
* Discussion centered on how such a policy would be distributed since
* Discussion centered on offending others (Europe, the US not attending

centers * an research centers. Deemed to be a success. There was a meeting

central * signed (Omni Park Central, NYC), the rates will be a bit higher than

certain * Agenda item #9: ICCV93: Berlin (May?): Date not certain (partly due to

certificate * Agenda Item #3b: Ramesh Jain was awarded his certificate for

chair * #16. Election of a new PAMI-TC chair (Huang).
* (Haralick) as chair invited everyone to attend and vote, etc. to
* (Miami). (Tom Huang, General Chair). Two tracks, one on Motion on
* 7:00 Linda Shapiro Chair.
* Agenda item #15: New Chair: T. Huang's term ends July 30. A committee
* amount of paper the program chair needs to handle and mail out.
* C Dyer/Ikeuchi program chair, Bhanu as general chair.
* chair of the TC, then the EC can bring the membership issue to the
* chairs approved last year. The Seattle Westin Hotel has been
* conference chair and it fell behind. Some discussion of the budget
* content. T Huang General Chair. Negahdaripur local.
* Discussion: the TC chair appoints all delegates, with nominal renewal every
* final decisions by the program co-chairs (Tsuji, Olaf, and Kak), they
* from Europe as the program chairs. [Y. Shirai reported that the assignment
* from Japan). The program committee totals 34 people (3 program chairs,
* general chair, and Profs. Tsuji and Kak plus a third person (not yet
* general chair/ Burt and Flinchbaugh as program chairs).
* Goldgof/Medioni program chair. (PC about 30 people).
* is that the TC chair be a permanant delegate.
* J. Aloimonos (J. Aggarwal chair) proposed the NorthEast with industry
* June 3-7, 1990. R. Bajcsy is the vice-chair. There will be 4 separate
* K. Bowyer and D. Goldgof (S. Tanimoto and L. Shapiro program chairs)
* Kevin Boywer elected chair.
* Motion (TC chair is one of the delegates) carried, no opposition.
* next chair of the PAMI TC.
* of either program chair or general chair to Nagao and Tsuji should
* possible dates, co-chairs, and possible program committee members.
* pressures on the program chairs to add papers.
* ProgChair, Bhanu as General Chair.
* recommendation of the current chair. T. Huang will be proposed as the
* service as the past chair. The appointed officers were announced:
* the chairs as indicated above.
* the fall of 1990 with someone from Japan as a co-chair, and add 7 more
* to be held in December 1989 with Anil Jain as the general chair. This
* Treasurer: Jake Aggarwal, Secretary: Keith Price, Vice-Chair: Eric
* VI. Election of the TC Chair
* visce chairs from different countries.
40 for chair.

champaign * after 5 meetings in cities (well Champaign-Urbana). Several things
* Champaign ($109 per night). The call for papers is on the CVPR92
* Champaign, Ill -- CVPR92

chance * (And said the chance of this happening is very low)

change * (Haralick) Motion: Change the name of the conference to Computer
*

  • Proposal to change ICCV to be a showcase conference that unifies the
    * change depending on the location of the conference.] The proposal
    * regarding the sudden change in ICPR from most submitted papers to
    * was tabled by a vote of Yes (to table) 16, No 11, Abstain 14. Thus, no change

    changed * CVPR has changed its flavor, so that many do not send papers here
    * expanded and changed a little. Student housing is at Columbia
    * new Transactions on Image Processing (ASSP has changed its name to
    * Patrick: How things have changed? Year ago budget was $4K, now

    changes * changes based on discussions at this meeting (with regard to conference
    * Changes made in the executive committee (Section 3.2) were removal after
    * changes, control of conferences, and possible TAB actions regarding the
    * for possible changes.
    * From: Continue, negotiate changes, jump ship, or beome society,
    * something changes)? We don't distinguish, but take both.
    * the last TC newsletter. Several minor changes were made at the meeting.
    * with changes.
    8 for changes.

    chants * Chants: AVI AVI AVI AVI ...

    character * Anaysis. Character recognition, engineering drawings, and music are the

    characterization * Agenda item #11a: Performance Characterization of Vision Algorithms
    * Performance characterization issues, analyze problem of numerical

    charge * (TC) and good mailing list (PAMI). IEEE-CS charges about $2.00 per
    * allowed by the Computer Society. The question is wheather to charge
    * page (with the provision that the excess page charge will be paid
    * them, how much to charge, what would they provide, what services would

    charging * charging for extra pages (money goes to program committee). Discuss

    cheaper * (which is cheaper to stay and get to). Puerto Rico? (St Thomas is
    * Mention: Key West is cheaper (Miami)?
    * out a cheaper meal alternative. Airfare is $400-500 (with no Saturday
    * some as low as $45. Osaka is considerably cheaper than Tokyo. The
    * there are cheaper nearby hotels. Meal costs are a larger issue -- no

    cheating * more cheating by not stating that the paper is the same, that the

    chellappa * Agenda item #3: R. Chellappa gave a report on CVPR-89: 327 papers have been
    * Agenda item #6: CVPR89 (R. Chellappa): At the Sheraton Grand
    * Item 3. CVPR89. (Rama Chellappa) 330+ registered, thanks to John

    china * China, 230 accepted + 110 posters + 15 invited papers (40 from China).
    * with China. H. Freeman discussed the organizing problems. About 680

    choices * choices to consider are US Virgin Islands and Cancun (Mexico)

    choose * 15 meeting in Dallas of the program committee will choose the final
    * Motion: (Bill Thompson, seconded K. Bowyer) To choose between Seattle

    chosen * chosen) from

    circulated * Presented his petition, circulated on Wednesday and Thursday.

    circulation * one is at 1K. Advantage is wide circulation because of being

    citation * in <3 months. A citation analysis and impact report (by IEEE for all

    cities * after 5 meetings in cities (well Champaign-Urbana). Several things

    city * Agenda item #7: H. Freeman reported that ICPR will be held in Atlantic City on
    * Item 8. ICPR. (Jake Aggarwal) Atlantic City, June 17-21, 1990 (new
    * PAMI TC Meeting of June 15, 1993. New York City.

    claim * are added. We currently claim >1000 members for the IAPR which gives

    clairfy * Item 8 to clairfy the context of the motion.

    clarification * Clarification that IAPR newsletter must be sent to the US community.

    classification * classification, stocastic, ...). One role of prog. comm. is to be

    clear * organization itself. At the moment it is not clear that we do not
    * reviewers, but it is not clear is it helped. [Comment on double blind

    close * for later meetings. ICCV-2 was close to break even or a small loss.
    * Further discussion included why the meeting was scheduled so close to

    club * Agenda item #3: AIPR88: Scheduled for the Cosmos Club in DC, but cannot
    * Club is going to vote as to admitting women as members.

    cmu * at CMU (one of the 10 highest at CMU 500 per week -- send mail to
    * Steve Shafer at CMU).

    coast * restrictions) from the East Coast. Access is through Miami or San Juan.
    * some discussion of a West Coast location, with no other suggestions at
    * to consider Hawaii, but the east coast is the right cycle. Two

    columbia * expanded and changed a little. Student housing is at Columbia

    com * ftp.ads.com for access (there are some images already available from

    combined * be combined into the PAMI newsletter (one mailing). Thus,

    come * it comes to you.
    * open up the process. But we are not keeping track of who comes and
    * Q: Limits on PAMI pages? Really come from total subscriptions.
    * the 3 reviews, 2 come quickly, the third takes time.
    * the reviewers come from more than the program committee and that it need
    * votes among the membership by mail and not just who comes to the
    6 for come.

    comm * Motion: That the program committee reconsider that the Prog Comm
    * classification, stocastic, ...). One role of prog. comm. is to be
    * Program Comm: 40; Office 22, Advance program 22, call for papers

    comment * At this point a comment about the Agenda of the meeting being a
    * Comment on earlier motion, that CS will not like the idea that PAMI
    * Comment that no Pattern Recognition in 1995.
    * Comment that posters had 2 pages -- that was low. Possible same
    * Comment that the TC list should be updated and maintained.
    * Comment: (Freeman) Point missed, did this group want to have an
    * Freeman comment there is not a CVPR95.
    * program, it requires a comment on other submissions. The program
    * reviewers, but it is not clear is it helped. [Comment on double blind
    * Tanimoto comment, there are many things that can be done and are
    * that. The number that attend both is small. Comment about the
    11 for comment.

    commentary * Open question is whether there is running commentary (currently no).

    commented * balance. (Gerson commented on AIPR, heavily industrial.) Discussion
    * commented that the TC keeps a portion of any conference surplus with an
    * proposal due to the large overlap with PAMI. Al Bovik commented that

    comments * (LShapiro) Comments on next progComm.
    *

  • Comments on why both ICPR and ICCV exist.
    * Comments were duly noted by the organizers.
    * Comments: (J Mundy) Reminded that some past meetings with weak reviews
    * expanding to a 5th track if space is available. Additional comments
    * guidelines and other TC officers). Send any comments to E. Kent.
    * Notes for future committees and comments:
    7 for comments.

    commit * Steve: afraid that the number that would commit to the time is low.

    committee * IEEE Computer Society PAMI Technical Committee Meeting
    * (CS-Press), which has helped publication. There is a CS committee
    * 15 meeting in Dallas of the program committee will choose the final
    * 1992. (Bir Bhanu) Program committee of D. Dyer and M. Herman, J.
    * Motion: That the program committee reconsider that the Prog Comm
    *

  • This committee (TC members) should set the size of CVPR (number of
    * A motion (by T. Boult) to reccomend to the committee that the printed
    * a Technical Committee). Software Engineering became a TCouncil, with
    * Agenda item #15: New Chair: T. Huang's term ends July 30. A committee
    * Aggarwal and A. Rosenfeld) on June 5. The program committee has 20
    * Changes made in the executive committee (Section 3.2) were removal after
    * charging for extra pages (money goes to program committee). Discuss
    * committee is being assembled and will meet at the University of
    * committee of 50 people. Try to add other workshops around ICCV, if
    * committee to ask authors if they have an overlap in their
    * control the program committee should have, whether it would lead to
    * convey the intent of the TC to the program committee.
    * Establish a committee (Avi) to
    * Establish an executive committee of 12 appointed by the
    * for Saturday. Publicize the names of the program committee!
    * from Japan). The program committee totals 34 people (3 program chairs,
    * least one from the program committee. In the January Program Committee
    * many of the current program committee members: hold ICCV-III in Japan,
    * Maryland in January. Rather than the entire committee (due to the
    * money so that most of the program committee can meet. The
    * Motion by B. Haralick for an Awards committee to consider IEEE Fellows
    * night). 98 papers and 45 posters. 22 committee members were at the LA
    * Notes for future committees and comments:
    * of the technical committee.
    * other committees. The
    * papers submitted, 2 program committee reviewers, L. Davis, R. Jain and
    * possible dates, co-chairs, and possible program committee members.
    * program committee, with a small intersection with the previous year, and
    * reviewers are used (more than the committee) for 311 papers, 197 US, 23
    * similar to ICCV-2 (blind reviews, program committee, etc.), with the
    * Some suggestion (from IEEE-CS) to have an executive committee and
    * Steering Committee: TSHuang, APentland, PStucki, sponsored by
    * submitted and have been sent to the program committee for review, with
    * that a reasonable fraction of the committee meet to decide on the
    * The agenda so far for the June PAMI Technical Committee Meeting
    * the IAPR executive committee
    * The result of the discussion is that the executive committee of the PAMI
    * the reviewers come from more than the program committee and that it need
    * The term is over for Avi Kak. The nomination Committee of Tom
    * to the possible program committee list.
    * with the standard blind reviewing process. 28 of the 43 committee
    47 for committee.

    common * J. Mundy discussed 2 projects in a Common IU environment sponsored by

    community * Clarification that IAPR newsletter must be sent to the US community.
    * input from the PAMI community.

    comparable * are comparable to past meetings. He also observed that this is the

    compared * meeting of the PAMI TC membership when compared to the PAMI journal

    complain * delayed (due to audience members, etc.). Complain to Anil if there

    computational * 7. Shape and Pattern Matching in Computational Biology Workshop:

    computer * IEEE Computer Society PAMI Technical Committee Meeting
    * #12. Proposal for a second Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (Dyer).
    * #5. Report on 1992 Applications of Computer Vision (Bhanu). First WS,
    * (AK:) should be sessions on Computer Vision and Image Processing and
    * (Haralick) Motion: Change the name of the conference to Computer
    * 1. International Symposium on Computer Vision
    * 3. PAMI Page in Computer Magazine: L. Shapiro
    * 8. Workshop on Computer Vision (Visual Motion): D. Goldgof, G.
    * AFIPS dissolved, the IEEE-Computer Society assumed responsibility
    * Agenda item #11: Workshop on Computer Vision Applications: December 2-4,
    * allowed by the Computer Society. The question is wheather to charge
    * and computer vision.
    * Computer Society level rather than the PAMI-TC level. CAIA-89 may have
    * Computer Vision and document analysis. (Haralick) perspective on
    * dates). There are 4 distinct tracks: Computer Architecture, Signal
    * discussion of the distribution by the Computer Society of the call for
    * IEEE Computer will feature 1 or 2 TCs each issue. PAMI will appear in
    * in San Diego, June 6-8 with an AI and Computer vision Workshop (J.
    * Issues with the computer society. Initially they wanted to budget
    * origin of CVPR from PRIP for the purpose to bring in Computer Vision
    * past there has been a Workshop on Computer Vision as an outlet for
    * Processing Society (Dave Munson) approached the Computer Society about a
    * Processing, Pattern Recognition Systems, and Computer Vision. A lot of
    * program. There is a possible Human-Computer Vision workshop on the
    * review time. Spring 1992 issue on Computer Vision and Computer
    * Robotics and Automation Society left the Computer Society and has 4-5K
    * Signal Processing). The Computer Society Board opposed the T-IP
    * solely the Computer Society, Active group with several conferences
    * The office is filled by the IEEE Computer Society president on the
    * third Computer Vision meeting in 2.5 months, all in California, and this
    * to balance Pattern Recognition and IP. Over the years, Computer
    * too high) are based on a formula. For the computer area as a whole,
    * Vision and Graphics, Learning in Computer Vision. There are new
    * Vision has increased to the point where Computer Vision dominates
    35 for computer.

    concentrating * a meeting (concentrating on the intended difference between ICCV and

    concern * Concerns regarding the cost were addressed. The hotel is $120 in 1997
    * disscussion indicated some concern in the international representation
    * Huang) This issue grows from concerns about the different meetings

    conferece * conferece. In IP, there is none. (Bolle) We tried to get Pattern

    conference * (Freeman) Cultural problem, once a conference doesn't have some
    * (Haralick) Motion: Change the name of the conference to Computer
    * 2. 2nd Document Analysis and Recognitin Conference: R. Haralick
    * 4. Third International Conference on Document Analysis and
    * 400 people on the conference lists that were not on the TC list were contacted
    * 5. Fourth International Conference of Document Analysis and
    *

  • Desire for filtering truely bad papers from conferences -- too many poor
    *
  • Favor broader based conference including image processing and pattern
    *
  • Proposal to change ICCV to be a showcase conference that unifies the
    *
  • Strong desire for one strong conference with a few of the best papers.
    * Agenda item #13: Conference guidelines (R. Haralick): Discussion of the
    * budget to last year's surplus (35%) in conferences. We thus need to
    * change depending on the location of the conference.] The proposal
    * changes based on discussions at this meeting (with regard to conference
    * changes, control of conferences, and possible TAB actions regarding the
    * commented that the TC keeps a portion of any conference surplus with an
    * conference chair and it fell behind. Some discussion of the budget
    * conference or separate track to make such papers be submitted.
    * conference) is in Singapore in 1995 and probably in Korea in 1997.
    * conference, upstairs rooms are HOT. (L. Davis): about 270
    * conference. An issue is who is a member? and a structure of a
    * conferences (each single track) run in parallel. IAPR is the sponsor,
    * conferences is a terrible idea -- applications drive CV. More
    * conferences, whether the TC should dictate conference format, and how to
    * discussion of the lack of "AI" in PAMI, AI related conferences, name
    * discussion of worry and how to deal with overlap of other conferences
    * equivalent papers were rejected on the grounds of prior conference
    * feasible, discussions on international conferences should be held at
    * feels that it is important for the next conference to budget for travel
    * had been expected. The conference should have a small surplus. She
    * Haralick) It has become the First International Conference on Document
    * In 1995 there is only 1 major conference, so proposed to have a CV
    * in the conference and in
    * initial filtering. Discussions included the nature of the conference,
    * international conferences. Passed Yes: 11, No: 9, Abstain: 7.
    * is that any papers submitted to both conferences (i.e. CVPR and ICCV)
    * Item 12. Discussion of standards for papers, and conferences. (Tom
    * leaves. (Get 35% of profit of the conference only.) (AJ:) It is
    * multiple conferences, a motion: (Tom Binford): The the policy of CVPR
    * Notification will be June 17. The conference generated a motion
    * of conference facilities, each with a range of hotels from $25-$100.
    * of the "Pami TC" at the conference and the next ICCV conference
    * or the other conference.
    * papers weakens the conference.
    * pay attention to the workshop and conference budgets. This also
    * proposal to have guidelines for major conferences, including the nature,
    * question of whether one conference can handle all of them is another
    * recognition, all in one place. This gives a conference ranging from AI
    * retain more conference income, but decisions were postponed until the
    * scheduling and the problems of multiple conferences in the same year
    * so about 100 papers are expected. Pre-conference tutorials are being
    * solely the Computer Society, Active group with several conferences
    * TC will prepare a proposal regarding conferences that addresses these
    * The conference fees (which were considered
    * The conference has (currently) about 250 students, 230-250 members,
    * the conference numbers are decreasing so the CS requires budgeting
    * the conference.
    * there are not the other conferences that make tons of money.
    * there is an annual conference in roughly late June in the US (or North
    * to fund additional pages in a transactions from a conference.
    * want Pattern Recognition papers or not. Image Processing has a new conference. Issue is whether
    * was requested. The allocation is 1/3 of the conference surplus plus some more
    * We need better information on attendence and conference budget
    * whether one month or 6 months apart, travel to major conferences
    66 for conference.

    conflict * (due to conflicts with schools on the quarter system).
    * desire not to conflict with CVPR93).
    * Discussion on dates of ICCV/CVPR and conflicts
    * is a conflict and will be shifted.

    confused * dimensions are being confused (selectivity, topic area,

    conjunction * conjunction with CVPR93 (Sunday/Monday). This is a follow up to a

    connections * Rooms range from $15-$150, with the University connections. ACCV (Asian

    consider * choices to consider are US Virgin Islands and Cancun (Mexico)
    * For future meeting, if this is done, consider offering an extra
    * Item 11. No admendments to consider.
    * Motion by A. Rosenfeld (W. Martin second) to consider Item #13 next.
    * Motion by B. Haralick for an Awards committee to consider IEEE Fellows
    * on Thursday to consider the proposals.]
    * papers, and working groups to consider issues.
    * to consider Hawaii, but the east coast is the right cycle. Two
    * You remember the Hawaii meeting and we could consider some resort
    9 for consider.

    considerably * some as low as $45. Osaka is considerably cheaper than Tokyo. The

    considered * important so that PAMI members are considered for awards, fellows, and
    * The conference fees (which were considered
    * were poorly considered. (T. Binford) Quality is shown by innovation and

    considering * Considering a workshop on Purposive Vision (Aloimonos and Rosenfeld).

    constant * Pages will remain constant over the near term.

    contacted * 400 people on the conference lists that were not on the TC list were contacted

    content * content. T Huang General Chair. Negahdaripur local.
    * the non-US PAMI members may receive the contents both from their national

    context * 3. Workshop on Context based Vision: J Mundy and T Strat June 1995
    * Item 8 to clairfy the context of the motion.
    * Q: Some distinguished between context and domain speific (ie
    * Radius where context is used. Time Tied to ICCV.
    * the correct definition of Context.

    contigeny * registration 15, CS Admin 24, Contigeny 17, Treasureer and bank 5,

    continents * 4 continents.

    continuation * Agenda Item #9: The PAMI Newsletter, A. Rosenfeld. (Continuation of

    continue * 70 people, desire for the meeting to continue. 90 submissions, 2 on
    * Agenda Item #3: CVPR94, Linda Shapiro. The plans continue with the
    * From: Continue, negotiate changes, jump ship, or beome society,

    continued * continued. With possibly different alternatives for the future of

    contract * Agenda Item #2: CVPR93, Ruud Bolle. The hotel contract has been

    contribution * contributions to the fields of pattern recognition, image processing,
    * outstanding contribution to the information processing field for fundamental

    control * changes, control of conferences, and possible TAB actions regarding the
    * control over its income, its mailing list, its activities (including
    * control the program committee should have, whether it would lead to
    * Eric G: Herb hit the issue, control over our fate in addition to
    * pages in final form. This reduces the lag time and controls the

    convert * interest, can convert it to HTML. A discussion regarding paper or

    convey * convey the intent of the TC to the program committee.

    cooperate * Univ of Zurich with PAMI TC as cooperate.

    copies * 20 associate editors, about 10,000 copies of each issue, $24/year for
    * And the problem of getting more than the original 550 copies
    * publish 300 library copies. Profit from PAMI is 300K goes to
    * Q: Re IEEE sponsored vs private journal? PAMI 10K copies, no other

    core * with 100K members, about 150 core volunteers, and 10-15K other

    corfu * b. Corfu, Greece proposal: Tsotsos, Zucker, Blake

    correct * the correct definition of Context.

    cosmos * Agenda item #3: AIPR88: Scheduled for the Cosmos Club in DC, but cannot
    * be held there under IEEE-CS. It is now sponsored by SPIE and the Cosmos

    cost * a list of available lower cost nearby hotels.
    * Concerns regarding the cost were addressed. The hotel is $120 in 1997
    * covered the cost. The prposal is to have another on next year (CVPR
    * Discussion of the hotel costs, and possible dorm accomodations, and
    * mailing costs dominate at about $8K to $10K each. The IAPR newsletter
    * non-US participants failed to receive the newsletter. The mailings cost about
    * of us want to to be with IEEE, to have low cost journal. Maybe
    * of the proceedings, Eric was told that any more would cost
    * Physical mailing list (TC, Transactions). Issues of cost.
    * provided at cost (rather than sales prices) if they were available.
    * raised the issue of the $1500 dues we pay to IAPR and the cost of
    * selected. The cost is about the same as NYC. The banquet location
    * the cost being covered by the package and library rates).
    * there are cheaper nearby hotels. Meal costs are a larger issue -- no
    * within IEEE, and the low cost. Private publishers are happy to
    15 for cost.

    could * pages, money, awards, etc. So, could we do anything to improve
    * rejection ratio. (T. Boult) Posters could be submitted as posters.
    * You remember the Hawaii meeting and we could consider some resort

    council * Issues raised were Technical Council (a bit more freedom than

    count * First count: Seattle: 22. NY: 22.
    * page count (from 900 to 1350) and is now at about 1 issue. Proposals
    * Passed: (Overwhelming, no exact count taken).
    * Second count: Seattle: 23. NY: 24.

    countires * etc. (from 20 countires). The pattern is similar to ICCV87. Sent to 3

    countries * and 100 members (around 600 registered so far). From 24 countries and
    * papers submitted from 26 countries, 270 from
    * visce chairs from different countries.

    cover * Critical Mass for a society. Dues enough to cover expenses/.

    covered * areas covered, etc. A discussion of how to deal with these and how to
    * covered the cost. The prposal is to have another on next year (CVPR
    * the cost being covered by the package and library rates).

    covering * with most of the money covering the newsletter and the rest for travel

    crazy * (Rosenfeld) Newsletter was discussed earlier, crazy mailing list

    create * Proposed to create a short list of US members that attend CVPR,

    created * Amendment that email list be created and a separate non-email.
    * The Harry Goode Award was created by AFIPS in 1964 and in 1990 when

    criteria *

  • Favor wider acceptance criteria (larger number of papers) since the

    critical * Critical Mass for a society. Dues enough to cover expenses/.
    * Ram: Not sure we have the critical mass to become a society, most

    crowley * a. Annecy, France (near Grenoble) proposal: Mohr, Horaud, Crowley

    crucial * A: When crucial decisions need to be made must be made by the

    cultural * (Freeman) Cultural problem, once a conference doesn't have some

    current * 2. 1995 Budget: L. Shapiro. The current budget is about $14.8K for 1996 $15K
    * Agenda item #5: The current distribution of the IAPR newsletter will
    * Move to Amend to ask the current 4 members of the TC to go to
    *

  • The current size of 300+ people and 100 papers is about right.
    * A motion (by E. Grimson) that the current format, with written reviews returned
    * Agenda item #2: CVPR91: Current registration at about 290.
    * bigger and have some of what we want. Current relationship is
    * current call includes a requirement for stating the differences
    * current entire membership and to establish how the 12 would then be
    * current limit on funds in a TC account is $30,000 at one time. The
    * Current motion is an EC, which is a good thing that is willing to
    * etc. --- Current motion is only to broaden the meeting. Separate
    * many of the current program committee members: hold ICCV-III in Japan,
    * Q: Membership size (current 800), add this time 200 people. CS
    * recommendation of the current chair. T. Huang will be proposed as the
    * the 18 is not. The current paper backlog for publication is 114 (about
    * the PAMI-TC home page. Current membership is 1224, US 864, foreign 360.
    17 for current.

    currently * acceptance rate is currently less than T-PAMI and the review is so much
    * are added. We currently claim >1000 members for the IAPR which gives
    * Avi: Currently IEEE CS takes too much money and we do not get much
    * Graphics, Probabilistic Reasoning. Currently about 1 paper per day. Of
    * Open question is whether there is running commentary (currently no).
    * Sizes PAMI currently 1200 (with no dues), R&A is 7000, CS is 100K.
    * TC is responsible to mail out the IPAR newsletter. Currently twice
    * The conference has (currently) about 250 students, 230-250 members,
    * The TC is the US member group of IAPR with currently 4 delegates
    9 for currently.

    cushion * IEEE does build in a cushion, so be careful and plan for this.

    cut * between 1991 and 1992 was cut 40% due to the new formula that ties the

    cvpr * #14. CVPR96 Proposal (Bhanu). Proposal to have CVPR 1996 in
    * (CVPR, European CV, workshops, etc.).
    * (Goldgof, Acharya) Friday after CVPR. Q: on name multiple sensors
    * 1991 in Bonn). Saturday before or after CVPR.
    * 3. CVPR 97. R Nevatia. Discussing 1997 seems early.
    * 9. Double Submissions (CVPR, ICCV, etc). Little discussion, except that
    * Agenda item #3: R. Chellappa gave a report on CVPR-89: 327 papers have been
    * Agenda item #9: No CVPR in 1990.
    * Motion: to have a separate track CVPR to encourage submission of
    *

  • This committee (TC members) should set the size of CVPR (number of
    * Agenda Item #4: ICCV-93. The call for papers was available at CVPR.
    * Agenda item #8: CVPR 1992, June 15-20, Urbana IL. (N. Ahuja):
    * be out in the winter with a CVPR report, updated bylaws, etc. From the
    * between the CVPR submission and other submissions, and the general
    * both, CVPR received accepted ECCV titles.)
    * covered the cost. The prposal is to have another on next year (CVPR
    * CVPR has changed its flavor, so that many do not send papers here
    * CVPR money: $325.
    * CVPR), possible locations
    * CVPR), the breadth of PAMI, the relation of CVPR to IAPR and ICPR.
    * CVPR, etc., publish in the journal over the past 4 years.
    * Discussion on dates of ICCV/CVPR and conflicts
    * Eric: We have a larger budget because we made money on CVPR.
    * Formal motion that CVPR 97 that the USC group is is willing to do
    * in 1994. Planned for June 20-21 (after CVPR) 1996, with a
    * is that any papers submitted to both conferences (i.e. CVPR and ICCV)
    * Item 13. New business. CVPR 1991 (approximately June). Need
    * Motion: (Bill Thompson) That CVPR be held in the second half of June.
    * multiple conferences, a motion: (Tom Binford): The the policy of CVPR
    * Negahdaripur, Goldgof). 1995, there is no CVPR, no ICPR, ... in the
    * of CVPR-89 and adjourned at 10:30.
    * origin of CVPR from PRIP for the purpose to bring in Computer Vision
    * papers are available at CVPR. Mandate related to ICDR, but in the
    * prices), e.g. one package is CVPR, another is CVPR+xxx, etc.
    * Proposed to create a short list of US members that attend CVPR,
    * some felt that CVPR had been too narrow and some feel that it is
    * support other meetings. CVPR generates maybe 10K surplus. Today
    * This follows the successful workshop in Maui (CVPR 91) and
    40 for cvpr.

    cvpr88 * Agenda item #1: CVPR88 (R. Jain): About 350 at the

    cvpr89 * Agenda item #6: CVPR89 (R. Chellappa): At the Sheraton Grand
    * Item 3. CVPR89. (Rama Chellappa) 330+ registered, thanks to John

    cvpr91 * Agenda item #2: CVPR91: Current registration at about 290.

    cvpr92 * Agenda Item #1: CVPR92, Narendra Ahuja. There were 357 submissions,
    * Champaign ($109 per night). The call for papers is on the CVPR92
    * Champaign, Ill -- CVPR92

    cvpr93 * #1. CVPR93 (Aggarwal, Aloimonos, Bolle). Between 440 and 450 people
    * Agenda item #10: CVPR93 Proposals and discussion:
    * Agenda Item #2: CVPR93, Ruud Bolle. The hotel contract has been
    * conjunction with CVPR93 (Sunday/Monday). This is a follow up to a
    * desire not to conflict with CVPR93).

    cvpr94 * #6. Status on CVPR94 (Shapiro, Bowyer). Seattle, June 21-23, 4
    * 1. CVPR94: K. Bowyer.
    * Agenda Item #3: CVPR94, Linda Shapiro. The plans continue with the
    * CVPR94.
    * On CVPR94, the area of Image Processing is not called out.

    cvpr95 * Freeman comment there is not a CVPR95.

    cvpr96 * #14. CVPR96 Proposal (Bhanu). Proposal to have CVPR 1996 in
    * 2. CVPR96: K. Ikeuchi, B. Bhanu, C. Dyer
    * 9. CVPR96: K Ikeuchi and B Bhanu, June 1996, San Francisco

    cvpr97 * 3. CVPR97: R. Nevatia

    cvws * CVWS.

    cycle * to consider Hawaii, but the east coast is the right cycle. Two

    cynicism * cynicism that rejection means the paper is good). Issue of


    Last update:Fri Jul 14 08:58:20 PDT 1995
    Maintained by Keith Price, price@usc.edu
    Comments are welcome (or use email in Netscape, or the above address).