face * 1. International Workshop on Face Recognition: T. Huang.
* Q: Why just face recognition? Want to keep it small so just

facilities * meeting and others. Physically at MIT. For the A/V facilities for
* of conference facilities, each with a range of hotels from $25-$100.
* papers. There is a limit of 3 parallel sessions (set by the facilities,

fact * some emphasis on the fact that Pattern Recognition papers are acceptable. Need to

failed * Vote: Failed (voice vote)
* Motion failed: Yes 30, No 42.
* non-US participants failed to receive the newsletter. The mailings cost about

fair * because they don't fell that they will get a fair hearing (some

fall * Fall 1995, Zurich
* Agenda Item #6: CAD Based Vision, K. Ikeuchi. Roughly the fall of
* fall, but will be March 1993 in Nashville. Vanderbilt (A. Peters) will
* Held in Tskuba Japan this fall, over 260 papers, 20 were long 124
* in the fall of 1990 (October/November), with Prof. Nagao as the
* the fall of 1990 with someone from Japan as a co-chair, and add 7 more
6 for fall.

far * 3. PAMI Journal. Kasturi. So far in 1995, there are 220 submissions.
* and 100 members (around 600 registered so far). From 24 countries and
* So far, there are 316 pre registered and 53 walk-ins (369). An
* The agenda so far for the June PAMI Technical Committee Meeting

fast * short, 400 attended. Document analysis is fast moving and growing

fate * Eric G: Herb hit the issue, control over our fate in addition to

faugeras * a. Beijing proposal: Ma, Huang, Faugeras, Ohta, A. Jain;
* #4. Report ICCV 1993 (Huang) (Faugeras) In Berlin, Attended by

favor *

  • Favor broader based conference including image processing and pattern
    *
  • Favor wider acceptance criteria (larger number of papers) since the

    feasible * feasible, discussions on international conferences should be held at

    feature * IEEE Computer will feature 1 or 2 TCs each issue. PAMI will appear in

    february * #7. Upcoming CAD-Based vision (Ikeuchi). 1994, February 8-10 (W-F)

    fee * The fee should be about $250 with an expected attendance of 300 (200

    feel * Feel for support (interest):
    * feels that it is important for the next conference to budget for travel
    * some felt that CVPR had been too narrow and some feel that it is
    * Steve: If there are enough people who feel that we should look at
    * travel money. Tsuji feels that implementations (hardware and software)

    fees * The conference fees (which were considered

    fell * because they don't fell that they will get a fair hearing (some
    * conference chair and it fell behind. Some discussion of the budget

    fellow * Fellow of the IEEE by Tom Huang.
    * and we should do that. Also people to nominate IEEE Fellows.
    * important so that PAMI members are considered for awards, fellows, and
    * Motion by B. Haralick for an Awards committee to consider IEEE Fellows

    felt * some felt that CVPR had been too narrow and some feel that it is

    few *

  • Strong desire for one strong conference with a few of the best papers.
    * Cancun: few.
    * directions by drawing on the best few papers for the other meetings

    fewer * fewer members would mean (lower dues, fewer IAPR members).

    field * contributions to the fields of pattern recognition, image processing,
    * outstanding contribution to the information processing field for fundamental

    fifth * ICPR to approximately 75 papers each by acquiring a fifth room.

    fight * fight the issue with IEEE. IEEE is not forcing structure on us,

    filled * The office is filled by the IEEE Computer Society president on the

    filtering *

  • Desire for filtering truely bad papers from conferences -- too many poor
    * initial filtering. Discussions included the nature of the conference,

    final * 12 met to make the final decisions. The final selection gave
    * 15 meeting in Dallas of the program committee will choose the final
    * 15, proceedings 32, final program 10, anudi/visual 5, Keynotes 10,
    * final decisions by the program co-chairs (Tsuji, Olaf, and Kak), they
    * Final information in 2-3 months.
    * Final: India 55. Beijing 27.
    * introduced submissions in final form. This reduced greatly the
    * J. Mundy met to make final decisions, about 1/2 accepted. The top 4
    * members attended the selection meeting. The final total was 89 papers
    * pages in final form. This reduces the lag time and controls the
    * submission is in the Final form -- 6 pages in final form and only 6
    13 for final.

    finalize * reviewers with blind reviewing. A July 11 meeting will finalize the

    finally * this meeting at 250 Eric wanted 450 and the CS finally did allow 350.

    find * number of pages. Find a way to recycle the money to the TC by

    finiancial * E.g. Finiancial management.
    * Q: Who takes the finiancial risk? Hope proeedings from IEEE, up
    * week before. Finiancial Responsibility with ICPR, this is an

    finished * November or December with a deadline of September for the finished

    first * #5. Report on 1992 Applications of Computer Vision (Bhanu). First WS,
    * First count: Seattle: 22. NY: 22.
    * Haralick) It has become the First International Conference on Document
    * hard to get reviews to authors. 80% first review in 6 months. 20%
    * IEEE is the host. ICPR-92 will be in Holland. The first K. S. Fu award
    * IEEE-CS members. The first review is usually in <6 months with some
    * India selected after 2 rounds of voting. India led after the first round.
    * The goal is 6/12/18 (6 months for the first review, 12 months for the
    * This is not Jurassic Park. Yesterday the first on was held. Fully
    * what, and how relevant the issue is in the first place.
    10 for first.

    fix * Q: Motion to attempt to fix something, what is being fixed?

    fixed * Q: Motion to attempt to fix something, what is being fixed?

    flavor * CVPR has changed its flavor, so that many do not send papers here

    flinchbaugh * general chair/ Burt and Flinchbaugh as program chairs).

    floor * Linda Shapiro. No. Nominations from the floor.

    florida * There is a Workshop on Motion every about 3 years. Discussion of Florida

    flynn * O. Camps, P. Flynn, G. Stockman (June 1996).

    follow * conjunction with CVPR93 (Sunday/Monday). This is a follow up to a
    * follow the same 4 tracks as 1990. August, The Hague.

    followed * deal with selectivity issues followed. Some of the highlights of the
    * list and By-Laws are not being followed.
    * Utah. A discussion followed:

    follows * is as follows. Please send additional agenda items to Linda Shapiro,
    * This follows the successful workshop in Maui (CVPR 91) and

    forcing * fight the issue with IEEE. IEEE is not forcing structure on us,

    foreign * accepted), 92 foreign (19 accepted), 22 industrial papers. The numbers
    * the PAMI-TC home page. Current membership is 1224, US 864, foreign 360.

    form * Amendment to start as electronic and keep in this form.
    * Avi: That we should send a petition to IEEE to form the new
    * Discussion of mailing list form of membership database, signup,
    * groups will go over papers in more detail. The review form is
    * introduced submissions in final form. This reduced greatly the
    * pages in final form. This reduces the lag time and controls the
    * Report on should we form a society. Issues from last year: PAMI
    * submission is in the Final form -- 6 pages in final form and only 6
    9 for form.

    formal * enforcement of the existing rules. A: No formal way to get on the
    * Formal motion that CVPR 97 that the USC group is is willing to do
    * list is a mess. Q: (Kim Boyer) not a formal definition, or not an

    format * A motion (by E. Grimson) that the current format, with written reviews returned
    * conferences, whether the TC should dictate conference format, and how to
    * including review procedures, size (number of papers or people), format,

    formed * Steve: R&A really was formed by the efforts of one person.

    forming * Bir: We should look at forming a PAMI society.

    formula * between 1991 and 1992 was cut 40% due to the new formula that ties the
    * too high) are based on a formula. For the computer area as a whole,

    fourth * 5. Fourth International Conference of Document Analysis and
    * fourth day.

    fraction * that a reasonable fraction of the committee meet to decide on the

    france * a. Annecy, France (near Grenoble) proposal: Mohr, Horaud, Crowley

    francisco * June 1996, San Francisco.
    * (less than Seattle, Boston, San Francisco). Dorm space is an issue, but
    * 9. CVPR96: K Ikeuchi and B Bhanu, June 1996, San Francisco
    * between San Francisco, Rockies, Pittsburgh, and Boston. Next ICCV
    * California (San Francisco) (return from 1995). Dyer/Ikeuchi as

    freedom * Issues raised were Technical Council (a bit more freedom than

    freeman * (Freeman) Cultural problem, once a conference doesn't have some
    * Agenda item #7: H. Freeman reported that ICPR will be held in Atlantic City on
    * Agenda item #2: ICPR 88 (H. Freeman): Moved to Rome Italy (starting
    * Agenda item #7: ICPR 1992: (Herb Freeman) 1990 ICPR had a surplus with
    * Comment: (Freeman) Point missed, did this group want to have an
    * Freeman comment there is not a CVPR95.
    * Herb Freeman expressed thanks to T. Huang for his service.
    * Herb Freeman indicated that it is very important to have a newsletter,
    * Huang, Jake Aggarwal, A Rosenfeld, Avi Kak, Herb Freeman. Nominated
    * Mundy, T. Strat, C. Thorpe, H. Freeman, Ikeuchi. (Still in planning,
    * of A. Rosenfeld, H. Freeman, E. Riseman, J. Aggarwal nominated A. Kak
    * with China. H. Freeman discussed the organizing problems. About 680
    12 for freeman.

    friday * (Goldgof, Acharya) Friday after CVPR. Q: on name multiple sensors

    friendly * (Not friendly, wants to have it broader).
    * Amendment: Accepted the friendly Amendment to make it apply to the

    front * front money from various sources (Martin Marietta).
    * Hotels run around $100 on the sea front. Proposal was June, but that

    ftp * ftp.ads.com for access (there are some images already available from
    * list) volunteered the vision list archive with anonymous FTP from

    full * Agenda item #4: The PAMI newsletter has been sent out to the full
    * no invited papers. The full list of reviewers was not in the proceedings as

    fully * This is not Jurassic Park. Yesterday the first on was held. Fully

    function * the internals of algorithm. Function, Language, Scenarios,
    * tutorials (Monday), 3 Workshop planned (Visual Behaviors; Role of Function

    fund * to fund additional pages in a transactions from a conference.

    fundamental * get the proper arrangement with IEEE. Fundamental issue is that we
    * outstanding contribution to the information processing field for fundamental

    funding * the funding. Sould we investigate further?

    funds * current limit on funds in a TC account is $30,000 at one time. The

    further * Further discussion included why the meeting was scheduled so close to
    * the funding. Sould we investigate further?

    future * 383 paid. Students 150 (In future look at these totals).
    * continued. With possibly different alternatives for the future of
    * For future meeting, if this is done, consider offering an extra
    * Future special issues on Probabilistic Reasoning, Integration of
    * Notes for future committees and comments:
    * tracks, number of days, length of papers) to reduce future outside
    6 for future.

    fuzzy * transactions on Image Processing, Neural Networks, Fuzzy Systems. The


    Last update:Fri Jul 14 08:58:20 PDT 1995
    Maintained by Keith Price, price@usc.edu
    Comments are welcome (or use email in Netscape, or the above address).