face
* 1. International Workshop on Face Recognition: T. Huang.
* Q: Why just face recognition? Want to keep it small so just
facilities
* meeting and others. Physically at MIT. For the A/V facilities for
* of conference facilities, each with a range of hotels from $25-$100.
* papers. There is a limit of 3 parallel sessions (set by the facilities,
fact
* some emphasis on the fact that Pattern Recognition papers are acceptable. Need to
failed
* Vote: Failed (voice vote)
* Motion failed: Yes 30, No 42.
* non-US participants failed to receive the newsletter. The mailings cost about
fair
* because they don't fell that they will get a fair hearing (some
fall
* Fall 1995, Zurich
* Agenda Item #6: CAD Based Vision, K. Ikeuchi. Roughly the fall of
* fall, but will be March 1993 in Nashville. Vanderbilt (A. Peters) will
* Held in Tskuba Japan this fall, over 260 papers, 20 were long 124
* in the fall of 1990 (October/November), with Prof. Nagao as the
* the fall of 1990 with someone from Japan as a co-chair, and add 7 more
6 for fall.
far
* 3. PAMI Journal. Kasturi. So far in 1995, there are 220 submissions.
* and 100 members (around 600 registered so far). From 24 countries and
* So far, there are 316 pre registered and 53 walk-ins (369). An
* The agenda so far for the June PAMI Technical Committee Meeting
fast
* short, 400 attended. Document analysis is fast moving and growing
fate
* Eric G: Herb hit the issue, control over our fate in addition to
faugeras
* a. Beijing proposal: Ma, Huang, Faugeras, Ohta, A. Jain;
* #4. Report ICCV 1993 (Huang) (Faugeras) In Berlin, Attended by
favor
*
*
feasible
* feasible, discussions on international conferences should be held at
feature
* IEEE Computer will feature 1 or 2 TCs each issue. PAMI will appear in
february
* #7. Upcoming CAD-Based vision (Ikeuchi). 1994, February 8-10 (W-F)
fee
* The fee should be about $250 with an expected attendance of 300 (200
feel
* Feel for support (interest):
* feels that it is important for the next conference to budget for travel
* some felt that CVPR had been too narrow and some feel that it is
* Steve: If there are enough people who feel that we should look at
* travel money. Tsuji feels that implementations (hardware and software)
fees
* The conference fees (which were considered
fell
* because they don't fell that they will get a fair hearing (some
* conference chair and it fell behind. Some discussion of the budget
fellow
* Fellow of the IEEE by Tom Huang.
* and we should do that. Also people to nominate IEEE Fellows.
* important so that PAMI members are considered for awards, fellows, and
* Motion by B. Haralick for an Awards committee to consider IEEE Fellows
felt
* some felt that CVPR had been too narrow and some feel that it is
few
*
* Cancun: few.
* directions by drawing on the best few papers for the other meetings
fewer
* fewer members would mean (lower dues, fewer IAPR members).
field
* contributions to the fields of pattern recognition, image processing,
* outstanding contribution to the information processing field for fundamental
fifth
* ICPR to approximately 75 papers each by acquiring a fifth room.
fight
* fight the issue with IEEE. IEEE is not forcing structure on us,
filled
* The office is filled by the IEEE Computer Society president on the
filtering
*
* initial filtering. Discussions included the nature of the conference,
final
* 12 met to make the final decisions. The final selection gave
* 15 meeting in Dallas of the program committee will choose the final
* 15, proceedings 32, final program 10, anudi/visual 5, Keynotes 10,
* final decisions by the program co-chairs (Tsuji, Olaf, and Kak), they
* Final information in 2-3 months.
* Final: India 55. Beijing 27.
* introduced submissions in final form. This reduced greatly the
* J. Mundy met to make final decisions, about 1/2 accepted. The top 4
* members attended the selection meeting. The final total was 89 papers
* pages in final form. This reduces the lag time and controls the
* submission is in the Final form -- 6 pages in final form and only 6
13 for final.
finalize
* reviewers with blind reviewing. A July 11 meeting will finalize the
finally
* this meeting at 250 Eric wanted 450 and the CS finally did allow 350.
find
* number of pages. Find a way to recycle the money to the TC by
finiancial
* E.g. Finiancial management.
* Q: Who takes the finiancial risk? Hope proeedings from IEEE, up
* week before. Finiancial Responsibility with ICPR, this is an
finished
* November or December with a deadline of September for the finished
first
* #5. Report on 1992 Applications of Computer Vision (Bhanu). First WS,
* First count: Seattle: 22. NY: 22.
* Haralick) It has become the First International Conference on Document
* hard to get reviews to authors. 80% first review in 6 months. 20%
* IEEE is the host. ICPR-92 will be in Holland. The first K. S. Fu award
* IEEE-CS members. The first review is usually in <6 months with some
* India selected after 2 rounds of voting. India led after the first round.
* The goal is 6/12/18 (6 months for the first review, 12 months for the
* This is not Jurassic Park. Yesterday the first on was held. Fully
* what, and how relevant the issue is in the first place.
10 for first.
fix
* Q: Motion to attempt to fix something, what is being fixed?
fixed
* Q: Motion to attempt to fix something, what is being fixed?
flavor
* CVPR has changed its flavor, so that many do not send papers here
flinchbaugh
* general chair/ Burt and Flinchbaugh as program chairs).
floor
* Linda Shapiro. No. Nominations from the floor.
florida
* There is a Workshop on Motion every about 3 years. Discussion of Florida
flynn
* O. Camps, P. Flynn, G. Stockman (June 1996).
follow
* conjunction with CVPR93 (Sunday/Monday). This is a follow up to a
* follow the same 4 tracks as 1990. August, The Hague.
followed
* deal with selectivity issues followed. Some of the highlights of the
* list and By-Laws are not being followed.
* Utah. A discussion followed:
follows
* is as follows. Please send additional agenda items to Linda Shapiro,
* This follows the successful workshop in Maui (CVPR 91) and
forcing
* fight the issue with IEEE. IEEE is not forcing structure on us,
foreign
* accepted), 92 foreign (19 accepted), 22 industrial papers. The numbers
* the PAMI-TC home page. Current membership is 1224, US 864, foreign 360.
form
* Amendment to start as electronic and keep in this form.
* Avi: That we should send a petition to IEEE to form the new
* Discussion of mailing list form of membership database, signup,
* groups will go over papers in more detail. The review form is
* introduced submissions in final form. This reduced greatly the
* pages in final form. This reduces the lag time and controls the
* Report on should we form a society. Issues from last year: PAMI
* submission is in the Final form -- 6 pages in final form and only 6
9 for form.
formal
* enforcement of the existing rules. A: No formal way to get on the
* Formal motion that CVPR 97 that the USC group is is willing to do
* list is a mess. Q: (Kim Boyer) not a formal definition, or not an
format
* A motion (by E. Grimson) that the current format, with written reviews returned
* conferences, whether the TC should dictate conference format, and how to
* including review procedures, size (number of papers or people), format,
formed
* Steve: R&A really was formed by the efforts of one person.
forming
* Bir: We should look at forming a PAMI society.
formula
* between 1991 and 1992 was cut 40% due to the new formula that ties the
* too high) are based on a formula. For the computer area as a whole,
fourth
* 5. Fourth International Conference of Document Analysis and
* fourth day.
fraction
* that a reasonable fraction of the committee meet to decide on the
france
* a. Annecy, France (near Grenoble) proposal: Mohr, Horaud, Crowley
francisco
* June 1996, San Francisco.
* (less than Seattle, Boston, San Francisco). Dorm space is an issue, but
* 9. CVPR96: K Ikeuchi and B Bhanu, June 1996, San Francisco
* between San Francisco, Rockies, Pittsburgh, and Boston. Next ICCV
* California (San Francisco) (return from 1995). Dyer/Ikeuchi as
freedom
* Issues raised were Technical Council (a bit more freedom than
freeman
* (Freeman) Cultural problem, once a conference doesn't have some
* Agenda item #7: H. Freeman reported that ICPR will be held in Atlantic City on
* Agenda item #2: ICPR 88 (H. Freeman): Moved to Rome Italy (starting
* Agenda item #7: ICPR 1992: (Herb Freeman) 1990 ICPR had a surplus with
* Comment: (Freeman) Point missed, did this group want to have an
* Freeman comment there is not a CVPR95.
* Herb Freeman expressed thanks to T. Huang for his service.
* Herb Freeman indicated that it is very important to have a newsletter,
* Huang, Jake Aggarwal, A Rosenfeld, Avi Kak, Herb Freeman. Nominated
* Mundy, T. Strat, C. Thorpe, H. Freeman, Ikeuchi. (Still in planning,
* of A. Rosenfeld, H. Freeman, E. Riseman, J. Aggarwal nominated A. Kak
* with China. H. Freeman discussed the organizing problems. About 680
12 for freeman.
friday
* (Goldgof, Acharya) Friday after CVPR. Q: on name multiple sensors
friendly
* (Not friendly, wants to have it broader).
* Amendment: Accepted the friendly Amendment to make it apply to the
front
* front money from various sources (Martin Marietta).
* Hotels run around $100 on the sea front. Proposal was June, but that
ftp
* ftp.ads.com for access (there are some images already available from
* list) volunteered the vision list archive with anonymous FTP from
full
* Agenda item #4: The PAMI newsletter has been sent out to the full
* no invited papers. The full list of reviewers was not in the proceedings as
fully
* This is not Jurassic Park. Yesterday the first on was held. Fully
function
* the internals of algorithm. Function, Language, Scenarios,
* tutorials (Monday), 3 Workshop planned (Visual Behaviors; Role of Function
fund
* to fund additional pages in a transactions from a conference.
fundamental
* get the proper arrangement with IEEE. Fundamental issue is that we
* outstanding contribution to the information processing field for fundamental
funding
* the funding. Sould we investigate further?
funds
* current limit on funds in a TC account is $30,000 at one time. The
further
* Further discussion included why the meeting was scheduled so close to
* the funding. Sould we investigate further?
future
* 383 paid. Students 150 (In future look at these totals).
* continued. With possibly different alternatives for the future of
* For future meeting, if this is done, consider offering an extra
* Future special issues on Probabilistic Reasoning, Integration of
* Notes for future committees and comments:
* tracks, number of days, length of papers) to reduce future outside
6 for future.
fuzzy
* transactions on Image Processing, Neural Networks, Fuzzy Systems. The