gang * A gang of 7 is assembling an all-electronic on physics based vision.

gather * gather the information.

gave * 12 met to make the final decisions. The final selection gave
* Agenda item #1: R. Bajcsy gave a report on ICCV-II: There were 306 papers
* Agenda item #3: R. Chellappa gave a report on CVPR-89: 327 papers have been
* Agenda item #8: E. Riseman gave the report on the study of holding ICCV-III
* meeting, if both reviews gave a 4 or above, the paper was accepted. If

general * (Miami). (Tom Huang, General Chair). Two tracks, one on Motion on
* between the CVPR submission and other submissions, and the general
* C Dyer/Ikeuchi program chair, Bhanu as general chair.
* content. T Huang General Chair. Negahdaripur local.
* Discussion: General membership does not know what a TC is. There is
* general chair, and Profs. Tsuji and Kak plus a third person (not yet
* general chair/ Burt and Flinchbaugh as program chairs).
* of either program chair or general chair to Nagao and Tsuji should
* ProgChair, Bhanu as General Chair.
* to be held in December 1989 with Anil Jain as the general chair. This
10 for general.

generally * CD-ROM version and a bound version at the end of each year. Generally

generated * generated and only had 130 names, but each issue loses more names than
* Notification will be June 17. The conference generated a motion

generates * (Grimson:) PAMI generates 300K for the CS, but does not get any
* IEEE-CS generates about $300,000 from the Trans-PAMI (due to most of
* support other meetings. CVPR generates maybe 10K surplus. Today

gerard * Gerard:
* meeting to recognize the efforts of Gerard Medioni and S. Negahdaripour.
* Question regarding the dates (M-W before Thanksgiving), Gerard is

germany * Run by ICPR. Discussion of the 4th. 1996 in Germany, with various

gerson * balance. (Gerson commented on AIPR, heavily industrial.) Discussion

get * (Grimson:) PAMI generates 300K for the CS, but does not get any
* (which is cheaper to stay and get to). Puerto Rico? (St Thomas is
* Agenda item #8: PAMI Newsletter (A. Rosenfeld): It took 3 years to get
* America) even if ICCV is held and to get ICCV on a regular stable
* Avi: Currently IEEE CS takes too much money and we do not get much
* because they don't fell that they will get a fair hearing (some
* conferece. In IP, there is none. (Bolle) We tried to get Pattern
* CS gets to net profit (300K). ($24 for members, Libraries 900 of
* enforcement of the existing rules. A: No formal way to get on the
* get papers from each of the 20 associate editors -- some effort to
* get the proper arrangement with IEEE. Fundamental issue is that we
* get them to become active again. Maybe it needs a separate
* hard to get reviews to authors. 80% first review in 6 months. 20%
* ICCV, and ICPR (this year) to get the US membership for the IAPR
* leaves. (Get 35% of profit of the conference only.) (AJ:) It is
* Linda: Not sure what to spend the money on, hard to get the people
* looking into electronic versions. Library subscribers will get a
* makes money can we get any? No. Journals have nothing to do with
* Q: Motion can lead to many papers? Still struggling over how to get
* submissions number about 450/year and get 3 reviews.
* you want other workshops get the ideas in. Some supported by the
21 for get.

getting * And the problem of getting more than the original 550 copies

given * for the award. The award is given at most once a year, past recipients include
* Service awards: We have given them, but we haven't done it lately
* Thanks given to N. Ahuja, T. Huang and A. Rosenfeld for their work on
* was given to A. Rosenfeld at ICPR-88 in Rome. T. Pavlidis retired from

gives * are added. We currently claim >1000 members for the IAPR which gives
* recognition, all in one place. This gives a conference ranging from AI

giving * Not giving the process enough time, and should wait. Three

glen * maintain an email list. Send mail to Glen Healy.

goal * The goal is 6/12/18 (6 months for the first review, 12 months for the
* this. So state our goal and discuss the structure:

goes * charging for extra pages (money goes to program committee). Discuss
* is 4 per year and goes to the same list as a part of the TC newsletter.
* it now goes to the entire PAMI subscriber list. J. Aggarwal
* publish 300 library copies. Profit from PAMI is 300K goes to

going * Agenda Item #3a: Morphology workshop, Ed Delp. Was going to be this
* Club is going to vote as to admitting women as members.

goldgof * D. Goldgof, G. Medioni, S. Negahdaripur, T. Huang (Nov 1995)
* (Goldgof, Acharya) Friday after CVPR. Q: on name multiple sensors
* 2. Electronic Newsletter: D. Goldgof
* 8. Workshop on Computer Vision (Visual Motion): D. Goldgof, G.
* Goldgof/Medioni program chair. (PC about 30 people).
* K. Bowyer and D. Goldgof (S. Tanimoto and L. Shapiro program chairs)
* Negahdaripur, Goldgof). 1995, there is no CVPR, no ICPR, ... in the
7 for goldgof.

gone * is gone by the time the paper is published and the professor does not

good * (TC) and good mailing list (PAMI). IEEE-CS charges about $2.00 per
* broad and to draw in the papers, but good papers must be submitted.
* Current motion is an EC, which is a good thing that is willing to
* cynicism that rejection means the paper is good). Issue of
* good -- this leads to multiple journals, etc. Strive for quality.
* other good papers.
* papers as good. In this one Doc Anal had 2 submitted and 1 is in.
* PR papers) or that no good ones were there. Question is whether we
* Q: did it not include good people (e.g. document image analysis --
* Who are members for IAPR issues. We do not have a good structure of
10 for good.

goode * Strong discussion. Joseph Boykin attended to present the Goode award
* the Harry Goode award to Azriel Rosenfeld in recogniition of an
* The Harry Goode Award was created by AFIPS in 1964 and in 1990 when

governance * #3. Governance issues: Proposal for 12 member board (Haralick)

government * etc.) A balance of Industry, government and universities. Discussion

grand * Agenda item #6: CVPR89 (R. Chellappa): At the Sheraton Grand

graphics * 2. International Workshop on Graphics Recognition: R. Kasturi
* Graphics, Probabilistic Reasoning. Currently about 1 paper per day. Of
* Vision and Graphics, Learning in Computer Vision. There are new

great * Q: Last year, IEEE puts great restricctions on meetings and PAMI

greater * work with IEEE to work on a better arrangement to have greater

greatly * introduced submissions in final form. This reduced greatly the

greece * b. Corfu, Greece proposal: Tsotsos, Zucker, Blake

grenoble * a. Annecy, France (near Grenoble) proposal: Mohr, Horaud, Crowley

grimson * (Grimson) We do have an EC as the 4 officers (C, VC, S, T).
* (Grimson:) PAMI generates 300K for the CS, but does not get any
* (Tom Huang, Eric Grimson, Avi Kak, Keith Price)
* 1. ICCV95: Eric Grimson. 600 submissions with about 450 arriving
* 6. ICCV95: E. Grimson
* 8. ICCV Single Track? E. Grimson. Eric raised the issue of how many
* A motion (by E. Grimson) that the current format, with written reviews returned
* Grimson.
* Motion: (W.E.L. Grimson) -- It is the responsibility of the program
* Second. (Grimson)
10 for grimson.

grounds * equivalent papers were rejected on the grounds of prior conference

group * Comment: (Freeman) Point missed, did this group want to have an
* Formal motion that CVPR 97 that the USC group is is willing to do
* group to make decisions and bring them to the membership.
* groups will go over papers in more detail. The review form is
* papers, and working groups to consider issues.
* solely the Computer Society, Active group with several conferences
* The TC is the US member group of IAPR with currently 4 delegates
7 for group.

grow * and workshops, it is time to grow beyond a TC after 22 years,

growing * short, 400 attended. Document analysis is fast moving and growing

grows * Huang) This issue grows from concerns about the different meetings

guidelines * Agenda item #13: Conference guidelines (R. Haralick): Discussion of the
* guidelines and other TC officers). Send any comments to E. Kent.
* need, and scope of the guidelines, the layers of management for
* proposal to have guidelines for major conferences, including the nature,