iccv2 * Agenda item #12: Proposed Bylaws, postponed to the meeting at ICCV2, with
* Item 5. ICCV2 (Azriel Rosenfeld) The newsletter is a major expense,

iccv3 * Motion: That E. Riseman and R. Haralick study holding ICCV3 in Japan in

iccv87 * etc. (from 20 countires). The pattern is similar to ICCV87. Sent to 3

iccv88 * Agenda item #4: ICCV88 (A. Rosenfeld): A large number of

iccv93 * Agenda item #9: ICCV93: Berlin (May?): Date not certain (partly due to
* ICCV95 location will be decided at ICCV93 in Berlin in May and that

iccv95 * June 20, 1995: 8 p.m. at ICCV95
* 1. ICCV95: Eric Grimson. 600 submissions with about 450 arriving
* 6. ICCV95: E. Grimson
* ICCV95 location will be decided at ICCV93 in Berlin in May and that

icdar * (ICDAR '95): C. Y. Suen

icdr * papers are available at CVPR. Mandate related to ICDR, but in the

icpr * (ECCV, ICPR), a difficulty in determining what is different. Some
* 2 years (the delegates meet once every 2 years at ICPR).
* Agenda item #7: H. Freeman reported that ICPR will be held in Atlantic City on
*

idea * Comment on earlier motion, that CS will not like the idea that PAMI
* conferences is a terrible idea -- applications drive CV. More
* Sporting Activities etc. are the types of ideas. Also tied to ARPA
* you want other workshops get the ideas in. Some supported by the

ieee * IEEE Computer Society PAMI Technical Committee Meeting
* (TC) and good mailing list (PAMI). IEEE-CS charges about $2.00 per
* Fellow of the IEEE by Tom Huang.
* AFIPS dissolved, the IEEE-Computer Society assumed responsibility
* Agenda Item #7: TC Budget and IEEE-CS rules: A Kak. The budget
* and we should do that. Also people to nominate IEEE Fellows.
* Avi: Currently IEEE CS takes too much money and we do not get much
* Avi: That we should send a petition to IEEE to form the new
* Avi: Will draft a petition tonight for sending to IEEE.
* be a separate society under IEEE.
* be held there under IEEE-CS. It is now sponsored by SPIE and the Cosmos
* Discussion of who is a member of the TC (according to IEEE) the IEEE
* Draft a petitiion (and signed by over 100 people) to IEEE that we
* fight the issue with IEEE. IEEE is not forcing structure on us,
* get the proper arrangement with IEEE. Fundamental issue is that we
* IEEE Computer will feature 1 or 2 TCs each issue. PAMI will appear in
* IEEE does build in a cushion, so be careful and plan for this.
* IEEE is recommending that all TCs have some structure that will make
* IEEE is the host. ICPR-92 will be in Holland. The first K. S. Fu award
* IEEE to resolve this.
* IEEE-CS generates about $300,000 from the Trans-PAMI (due to most of
* IEEE-CS members. The first review is usually in <6 months with some
* II. Award Presentation. Joseph Boykin (IEEE CS VP for CS-Press) presented
* in <3 months. A citation analysis and impact report (by IEEE for all
* leave IEEE. All of these involve doing a lot of work, and there is
* Minutes of the IEEE PAMI TC Meeting
* Minutes of the IEEE PAMI TC Meeting
* Minutes of the IEEE PAMI TC Meeting
* Motion by B. Haralick for an Awards committee to consider IEEE Fellows
* Motion: (Tom Binford) That IEEE-PAMI-TC withdraw from IAPR. After
* of us want to to be with IEEE, to have low cost journal. Maybe
* on how balanced and the importance to IEEE.
* Q: Last year, IEEE puts great restricctions on meetings and PAMI
* Q: Re IEEE sponsored vs private journal? PAMI 10K copies, no other
* Q: Who takes the finiancial risk? Hope proeedings from IEEE, up
* Some suggestion (from IEEE-CS) to have an executive committee and
* The office is filled by the IEEE Computer Society president on the
* the production of all transactions was shifted from NJ (IEEE) to CA
* who is a member and who can vote. IEEE does not regard this as a
* within IEEE, and the low cost. Private publishers are happy to
* work with IEEE to work on a better arrangement to have greater
43 for ieee.

iii * Agenda item #8: E. Riseman gave the report on the study of holding ICCV-III
* III. Reports:
* many of the current program committee members: hold ICCV-III in Japan,

ikeuchi * #7. Upcoming CAD-Based vision (Ikeuchi). 1994, February 8-10 (W-F)
* 2. CVPR96: K. Ikeuchi, B. Bhanu, C. Dyer
* 9. CVPR96: K Ikeuchi and B Bhanu, June 1996, San Francisco
* Agenda Item #6: CAD Based Vision, K. Ikeuchi. Roughly the fall of
* AviKak/Ikeuchi.
* C Dyer/Ikeuchi program chair, Bhanu as general chair.
* California (San Francisco) (return from 1995). Dyer/Ikeuchi as
* Mundy, T. Strat, C. Thorpe, H. Freeman, Ikeuchi. (Still in planning,
8 for ikeuchi.

ill * Champaign, Ill -- CVPR92

imagery * Agenda item #2: No report on the Time-varying Imagery Workshop.

images * DARPA: RCDE for aerial images and IUE (an advanced RCDE). Asked for
* ftp.ads.com for access (there are some images already available from
* images used in papers to a data base), when to add since the student
* know where the images are. Phil Kahn (ADS and the net news vision

immediate * (Need an immediate solution.)

impact * in <3 months. A citation analysis and impact report (by IEEE for all

implementations * travel money. Tsuji feels that implementations (hardware and software)

importance * on how balanced and the importance to IEEE.

important * but it should be NEWS, even if it is only 2 pages and important that
* feels that it is important for the next conference to budget for travel
* Herb Freeman indicated that it is very important to have a newsletter,
* important so that PAMI members are considered for awards, fellows, and
* should be included in ICCV-3, since they are an important part of the

improve * pages, money, awards, etc. So, could we do anything to improve

include * Motion: That the 1995 Workshop expand the scope to include it in the
* for the award. The award is given at most once a year, past recipients include
* Q: did it not include good people (e.g. document image analysis --

included * and 70 posters. The submission included a summary page to aid the
* Further discussion included why the meeting was scheduled so close to
* included a suggestion that
* initial filtering. Discussions included the nature of the conference,
* should be included in ICCV-3, since they are an important part of the

includes * current call includes a requirement for stating the differences

including *

income * control over its income, its mailing list, its activities (including
* retain more conference income, but decisions were postponed until the
* submitted, 44 accepted, + 2 invited. The income was about $20K, and the

increase * Motion: (T. Pavlidis) To suggest an increase in the PR and CV tracks at

increased * (replacing C. Suen). The backlog has decreased due to the increased
* size of short papers be increased was passed: Yes 25, No 18, Abstain 6.
* Vision has increased to the point where Computer Vision dominates
* was for 260. Posters were increased to 3 pages in the proceedings. A

increasing * T-SP is increasing the Image Processing editors to 4.

india * d. India proposal: Ahuja
* Final: India 55. Beijing 27.
* India selected after 2 rounds of voting. India led after the first round.

indicate * indicate more specific topics within Pattern Recognition (High dimensional
* the policy in 1994 did not work. (Indicate it was submitted to

indicated * disscussion indicated some concern in the international representation
* Herb Freeman indicated that it is very important to have a newsletter,
* the chairs as indicated above.

individual * Americal individual subscribers of PAMI, approximately 10K people. The

industrial * accepted), 92 foreign (19 accepted), 22 industrial papers. The numbers
* balance. (Gerson commented on AIPR, heavily industrial.) Discussion
* centered on the need for more industrial involvement, and on the
* with 1/3 of this past year taken by industrial vision special issues

industry * etc.) A balance of Industry, government and universities. Discussion
* J. Aloimonos (J. Aggarwal chair) proposed the NorthEast with industry

inform * Have email addresses for authors. Inform authors of the rules, etc. for
* it more, the inform Steve.

information * (Joe) Roughly speaking, the use of information not involved with
* Final information in 2-3 months.
* gather the information.
* outstanding contribution to the information processing field for fundamental
* We need better information on attendence and conference budget

informed * keep other editors informed of the use of reviewers.

initial * initial filtering. Discussions included the nature of the conference,

initially * Issues with the computer society. Initially they wanted to budget
* Shafer, Wolff, Healy, Nayar, Woodam, Tomanaga, xx. Initially

innovation * 1, results by Middle of September. Innovation is that the
* were poorly considered. (T. Binford) Quality is shown by innovation and

input * input from the PAMI community.

ins * So far, there are 316 pre registered and 53 walk-ins (369). An

integration * Future special issues on Probabilistic Reasoning, Integration of

intellectual * We are almost a society now, the intellectual center is not

intelligent * workshops on manufacturing and intelligent robotics. This led to a

intended * a meeting (concentrating on the intended difference between ICCV and

intent * convey the intent of the TC to the program committee.

interest * Feel for support (interest):
* interest, can convert it to HTML. A discussion regarding paper or

internals * the internals of algorithm. Function, Language, Scenarios,

international * 1. International Symposium on Computer Vision
* 1. International Workshop on Face Recognition: T. Huang.
* 2. International Workshop on Graphics Recognition: R. Kasturi
* 4. Third International Conference on Document Analysis and
* 5. Fourth International Conference of Document Analysis and
* at the International House (downtown). The review procedures will be
* delays in international delivery of programs, etc.
* disscussion indicated some concern in the international representation
* feasible, discussions on international conferences should be held at
* Haralick) It has become the First International Conference on Document
* international conferences. Passed Yes: 11, No: 9, Abstain: 7.
* international issues at a national meeting, it was pointed out that the
12 for international.

interpreted * Discussion centered on how it would be interpreted, the

intersection * program committee, with a small intersection with the previous year, and

into * be combined into the PAMI newsletter (one mailing). Thus,
* looking into electronic versions. Library subscribers will get a

introduced * introduced submissions in final form. This reduced greatly the

investigate * the funding. Sould we investigate further?

investigating * investigating moving it back 1 day (end on Tuesday, Noon).

invited * (Haralick) as chair invited everyone to attend and vote, etc. to
* and was invited to respond.
* China, 230 accepted + 110 posters + 15 invited papers (40 from China).
* no invited papers. The full list of reviewers was not in the proceedings as
* submitted, 44 accepted, + 2 invited. The income was about $20K, and the

involve * leave IEEE. All of these involve doing a lot of work, and there is

involved * (Joe) Roughly speaking, the use of information not involved with
* Is it strong enough? Talk to those involved in Robotics&Auto.

involvement * centered on the need for more industrial involvement, and on the

ipar * #8. PAMI and IPAR Newsletters (Rosenfeld and Kasturi)
* TC is responsible to mail out the IPAR newsletter. Currently twice

iros * workshop. IROS is being held in pittsburgh in August (not much

irvine * is July 15, and the workshop on March 20-22 in Irvine, CA.

islands * choices to consider are US Virgin Islands and Cancun (Mexico)

issue * #3. Governance issues: Proposal for 12 member board (Haralick)
* $4500 for each issue.
* (less than Seattle, Boston, San Francisco). Dorm space is an issue, but
* (Nevatia) The basic issue is one of size -- PR/CV/IP -- and a
* 10 issues). This accounts for some of the requests to shorten the
* 160 papers. One issue to think about is the single track, which would
* 20 associate editors, about 10,000 copies of each issue, $24/year for
* 8. ICCV Single Track? E. Grimson. Eric raised the issue of how many
* Agenda Item #8: PAMI Transactions, Anil Jain. 12 issues, 1300 pages,
* Avi started the discussion by presenting the basic issues:
* Board meeting (next week) will propose that PAMI go to 12 issues and
* chair of the TC, then the EC can bring the membership issue to the
* conference. An issue is who is a member? and a structure of a
* cynicism that rejection means the paper is good). Issue of
* deal with selectivity issues followed. Some of the highlights of the
* Eric G: Herb hit the issue, control over our fate in addition to
* fight the issue with IEEE. IEEE is not forcing structure on us,
* for special issues in AI, Search in Vision, probabilistic reasoning,
* Future special issues on Probabilistic Reasoning, Integration of
* generated and only had 130 names, but each issue loses more names than
* get the proper arrangement with IEEE. Fundamental issue is that we
* Huang) This issue grows from concerns about the different meetings
* IEEE Computer will feature 1 or 2 TCs each issue. PAMI will appear in
* international issues at a national meeting, it was pointed out that the
* issue.
* issue.
* Issues for Discussion:
* issues for the next meeting.
* Issues raised were Technical Council (a bit more freedom than
* Issues with the computer society. Initially they wanted to budget
* issues.
* page count (from 900 to 1350) and is now at about 1 issue. Proposals
* PAMI mailing list. The third issue should
* papers, and working groups to consider issues.
* Performance characterization issues, analyze problem of numerical
* Physical mailing list (TC, Transactions). Issues of cost.
* publication. So an issue of who are the members so that business
* raised the issue of the $1500 dues we pay to IAPR and the cost of
* Report on should we form a society. Issues from last year: PAMI
* review time. Spring 1992 issue on Computer Vision and Computer
* size issue.
* The issue of a treasurer was discussed in light of the possibility to
* the same time, which brought up the usual long discussed issues of
* there are cheaper nearby hotels. Meal costs are a larger issue -- no
* There is now a postscript version of the last 2 issues. If there is
* Time to discuss the issue for next meeting.
* V. Issues for Discussion:
* want Pattern Recognition papers or not. Image Processing has a new conference. Issue is whether
* what, and how relevant the issue is in the first place.
* Who are members for IAPR issues. We do not have a good structure of
* with 1/3 of this past year taken by industrial vision special issues
51 for issue.

italy * Agenda item #2: ICPR 88 (H. Freeman): Moved to Rome Italy (starting

item * Agenda item #0: The minutes were approved after some discussion of whether
* Agenda item #10: The revised by-laws, distributed at ICCV-II, were
* Agenda item #11: The term of J. Aggarwal ends on May 31, 1989.
* Agenda item #12: The budget for 1989 and 1990 is about $12000 each,
* Agenda item #1: R. Bajcsy gave a report on ICCV-II: There were 306 papers
* Agenda item #2: No report on the Time-varying Imagery Workshop.
* Agenda item #3: R. Chellappa gave a report on CVPR-89: 327 papers have been
* Agenda item #4: The PAMI newsletter has been sent out to the full
* Agenda item #5: The current distribution of the IAPR newsletter will
* Agenda item #6: Proposal for a workshop on three-dimensional structures
* Agenda item #7: H. Freeman reported that ICPR will be held in Atlantic City on
* Agenda item #8: E. Riseman gave the report on the study of holding ICCV-III
* Agenda item #9: No CVPR in 1990.
* Agenda item #0: The minutes of the last meeting were approved
* Agenda item #10: CVPR93 Proposals and discussion:
* Agenda item #10: Transactions on PAMI (S. Tanimoto): At the Publications
* Agenda item #11: ICCV (J. Aggarwal): Discussion of the need to hold such
* Agenda item #11: Workshop on Computer Vision Applications: December 2-4,
* Agenda item #11a: Performance Characterization of Vision Algorithms
* Agenda item #12: Newsletter. None.
* Agenda item #12: Proposed Bylaws, postponed to the meeting at ICCV2, with
* Agenda item #13: Conference guidelines (R. Haralick): Discussion of the
* Agenda item #13: Transactions on PAMI: (A. K. Jain) Took over in
* Agenda item #14: Transactions on Image Processing, (A. K. Jain) The
* Agenda item #15: New Chair: T. Huang's term ends July 30. A committee
* Agenda item #16: New Business: Bobick discussed the Optical Society of
* Agenda item #1: CVPR88 (R. Jain): About 350 at the
* Agenda Item #1: CVPR92, Narendra Ahuja. There were 357 submissions,
* Agenda item #1: The minutes of the last meeting were approved.
* Agenda item #2: CVPR91: Current registration at about 290.
* Agenda Item #2: CVPR93, Ruud Bolle. The hotel contract has been
* Agenda item #2: ICPR 88 (H. Freeman): Moved to Rome Italy (starting
* Agenda item #3: AIPR88: Scheduled for the Cosmos Club in DC, but cannot
* Agenda item #3: CAD-Based Vision June 2-3: (Linda Shapiro) 69 were
* Agenda Item #3: CVPR94, Linda Shapiro. The plans continue with the
* Agenda Item #3a: Morphology workshop, Ed Delp. Was going to be this
* Agenda Item #3b: Ramesh Jain was awarded his certificate for
* Agenda item #4: Document Processing Workshop, September 30: (Bob
* Agenda Item #4: ICCV-93. The call for papers was available at CVPR.
* Agenda item #4: ICCV88 (A. Rosenfeld): A large number of
* Agenda Item #4a: ICCV 95. As the by-laws do not allow deciding
* Agenda item #5: Motion Workshop (October 7-9) (P. Anandan): 125 papers
* Agenda item #5: Motion Workshop (R. Jain): The paper deadline
* Agenda Item #5: Qualitative Vision Workshop: Phil Kahn. In
* Agenda Item #6: CAD Based Vision, K. Ikeuchi. Roughly the fall of
* Agenda item #6: CVPR89 (R. Chellappa): At the Sheraton Grand
* Agenda item #6: Workshop on Mathematical Morphology (Spring, Kentucky):
* Agenda item #7: CAIA (R. Haralick): CAIA is now run at the
* Agenda item #7: ICPR 1992: (Herb Freeman) 1990 ICPR had a surplus with
* Agenda Item #7: TC Budget and IEEE-CS rules: A Kak. The budget
* Agenda item #8: CVPR 1992, June 15-20, Urbana IL. (N. Ahuja):
* Agenda item #8: PAMI Newsletter (A. Rosenfeld): It took 3 years to get
* Agenda Item #8: PAMI Transactions, Anil Jain. 12 issues, 1300 pages,
* Agenda item #9: ICCV93: Berlin (May?): Date not certain (partly due to
* Agenda item #9: J. Aggarwal discussed the need for several officers.
* Agenda Item #9: The PAMI Newsletter, A. Rosenfeld. (Continuation of
* discussion from item 7.) It is sent mostly due to the IAPR membership
* is as follows. Please send additional agenda items to Linda Shapiro,
* Item 1. The previous minutes were approved with an addition to
* Item 10. Transactionns-PAMI. (Anil Jain for S. Tanimoto) The
* Item 11. No admendments to consider.
* Item 12. Discussion of standards for papers, and conferences. (Tom
* Item 13. New business. CVPR 1991 (approximately June). Need
* Item 2. Announcements. Tom Huang thanked Jake Aggarwal for his
* Item 3. CVPR89. (Rama Chellappa) 330+ registered, thanks to John
* Item 4. Motion Workshop. (Brian Schunk) 115 attended, 75 papers
* Item 5. ICCV2 (Azriel Rosenfeld) The newsletter is a major expense,
* Item 6. 3-D Workshop Austin TX, Nov 27-29, 1989. (Anil Jain) The
* Item 7. Newsletter. (Azriel Rosenfeld) The mailing is to the North
* Item 8 to clairfy the context of the motion.
* Item 8. ICPR. (Jake Aggarwal) Atlantic City, June 17-21, 1990 (new
* Item 9. ICCV-3. (Avi Kak) Will be held in Osaka, December 4-7, 1990,
* Motion by A. Rosenfeld (W. Martin second) to consider Item #13 next.
* Several related items were then discussed:
74 for item.

its * Motion: (Haralick) Specifically call out Image Processing and its subtopics
* bound to mail the newsletter to its members. After discussion
* control over its income, its mailing list, its activities (including
* CVPR has changed its flavor, so that many do not send papers here
* new Transactions on Image Processing (ASSP has changed its name to
* withdrawn by its maker.
8 for its.

itself * organization itself. At the moment it is not clear that we do not

iue * DARPA: RCDE for aerial images and IUE (an advanced RCDE). Asked for