larry * Allen Newell, Larry Roberts, King-Sun Fu.

lasers * America, (Lasers and Human Vision).

last * #2 Discussion (Kak): did we broaden the scope? After the last one
* 2. Non-rigid Motion Workshop. Jake Agarwal. Held last October.
* Agenda item #0: The minutes of the last meeting were approved
* Agenda item #1: The minutes of the last meeting were approved.
* budget to last year's surplus (35%) in conferences. We thus need to
* chairs approved last year. The Seattle Westin Hotel has been
* decision last year. Just because people want it doesn't mean it is
* Q: Last year, IEEE puts great restricctions on meetings and PAMI
* Report on should we form a society. Issues from last year: PAMI
* Steve: Discuss last year's proposal that we should reconsider
* the last TC newsletter. Several minor changes were made at the meeting.
* There is now a postscript version of the last 2 issues. If there is
* transactions subscriptions are down around 10% each of the last
13 for last.

late * A motion (by W. Thompson) to hold the meeting between Mid-June and late August
* available too late to be in
* known until late in the process.
* there is an annual conference in roughly late June in the US (or North
* too late for them to arrange locations, there will be a meeting

lately * Service awards: We have given them, but we haven't done it lately

later * for later meetings. ICCV-2 was close to break even or a small loss.
* [Later, after the proposers stated that December 1997 would be

laws * Agenda item #10: The revised by-laws, distributed at ICCV-II, were
* Agenda Item #4a: ICCV 95. As the by-laws do not allow deciding
* By-laws discussion.
* list and By-Laws are not being followed.
* The by-laws were passed by Yes: 20, No: 0, and Abstain: 7.

layers * need, and scope of the guidelines, the layers of management for

lead * control the program committee should have, whether it would lead to
* good -- this leads to multiple journals, etc. Strive for quality.
* Q: Motion can lead to many papers? Still struggling over how to get

learning * Vision and Graphics, Learning in Computer Vision. There are new

least * least one from the program committee. In the January Program Committee
* the least (all are down). Down 3%. Trans-C down 10% Possibility

leave * leave IEEE. All of these involve doing a lot of work, and there is
* leaves. (Get 35% of profit of the conference only.) (AJ:) It is

led * India selected after 2 rounds of voting. India led after the first round.
* workshops on manufacturing and intelligent robotics. This led to a

left * Robotics and Automation Society left the Computer Society and has 4-5K

legislate * Should we legislate the sessions.

length * tracks, number of days, length of papers) to reduce future outside

less * (less than Seattle, Boston, San Francisco). Dorm space is an issue, but
* acceptance rate is currently less than T-PAMI and the review is so much
* proposals within 6 months or less. A short presentation for holding the
* the TCs. Other journals in CS are less related others are

level * at a lower level.
* Computer Society level rather than the PAMI-TC level. CAIA-89 may have

libraries * CS gets to net profit (300K). ($24 for members, Libraries 900 of

library * looking into electronic versions. Library subscribers will get a
* publish 300 library copies. Profit from PAMI is 300K goes to
* the cost being covered by the package and library rates).

light * The issue of a treasurer was discussed in light of the possibility to

like * Comment on earlier motion, that CS will not like the idea that PAMI
* plan). As always, encourage associated workshops like this one.

limit * account limit of $30K at any one time. The surplus helps ease planning
* and the planned limit)
* current limit on funds in a TC account is $30,000 at one time. The
* papers. There is a limit of 3 parallel sessions (set by the facilities,

limitations * limitations of the number of allowable papers (3 and 4 tracks...).

limited * with agreement that the number of sessions should be limited, and

limits * Q: Limits on PAMI pages? Really come from total subscriptions.

linda * 7:00 Linda Shapiro Chair.
* Agenda item #3: CAD-Based Vision June 2-3: (Linda Shapiro) 69 were
* Agenda Item #3: CVPR94, Linda Shapiro. The plans continue with the
* is as follows. Please send additional agenda items to Linda Shapiro,
* Linda Shapiro. No. Nominations from the floor.
* Linda: Not sure what to spend the money on, hard to get the people
* Linda: We do use some of the pieces, do we want to provide the
* Meeting called to order, by Linda Shapiro at 8:10
* Motion: (Linda Shapiro) To select NY in 1993 and Seattle in 1994 with
9 for linda.

line * on-line versions or both.

list * (Human vision list has 1K members.)
* (Rosenfeld) Newsletter was discussed earlier, crazy mailing list
* (TC) and good mailing list (PAMI). IEEE-CS charges about $2.00 per
* 400 people on the conference lists that were not on the TC list were contacted
* a list of available lower cost nearby hotels.
* Amendment that email list be created and a separate non-email.
* Comment that the TC list should be updated and maintained.
* control over its income, its mailing list, its activities (including
* Discussion as to whether this is the list for the IAPR "society"
* Discussion of mailing list form of membership database, signup,
* is 4 per year and goes to the same list as a part of the TC newsletter.
* it now goes to the entire PAMI subscriber list. J. Aggarwal
* it when to the 10K list, but that is expensive.
* list and By-Laws are not being followed.
* list is a mess. Q: (Kim Boyer) not a formal definition, or not an
* list) volunteered the vision list archive with anonymous FTP from
* mail the newsletter directly to the US membership list (whatever that
* mailing the IAPR newsletter to the membership list (whatever that is).
* maintain an email list. Send mail to Glen Healy.
* no invited papers. The full list of reviewers was not in the proceedings as
* of the list.
* PAMI mailing list. The third issue should
* Physical mailing list (TC, Transactions). Issues of cost.
* Problem is not the mailing list, but the problem is that we don't
* Proposed to create a short list of US members that attend CVPR,
* requirement, but sent to a strange list. An electronic list was
* they had been mailed to the entire PAMI journal list or just the US portion
* to the possible program committee list.
* We are now maintaining our own list
32 for list.

little * Kresge Little Theater, M.I.T
* 9. Double Submissions (CVPR, ICCV, etc). Little discussion, except that
* expanded and changed a little. Student housing is at Columbia

load * processing, VLSI designs) and load balancing between tracks, and

local * Again for Terry Boult for local arrangements.
* content. T Huang General Chair. Negahdaripur local.
* do local arrangements.
* Questions regarding local expenses: under $70 for hotel is possible,
* Recognition for local arrangements (Terry Boult).

location * 5. ICCV '97 location
* 7. ICCV '99 location
* a North American location should be presented at that time. There was
* change depending on the location of the conference.] The proposal
* CVPR), possible locations
* ICCV95 location will be decided at ICCV93 in Berlin in May and that
* selected. The cost is about the same as NYC. The banquet location
* some discussion of a West Coast location, with no other suggestions at
* too late for them to arrange locations, there will be a meeting
9 for location.

london * in weather. Airfares are about $800-900 from London, and $1000 from

long * abstracting.] Posters are at "Prime" times with a long break for the
* expect about 300 papers submitted with 90 accepted (30 long, 60 short).
* Held in Tskuba Japan this fall, over 260 papers, 20 were long 124
* submitted 35 long and 54 short papers accepted.
* the same time, which brought up the usual long discussed issues of

look * 383 paid. Students 150 (In future look at these totals).
* Bir: We should look at forming a PAMI society.
* Steve: If there are enough people who feel that we should look at

looking * looking into electronic versions. Library subscribers will get a

loses * generated and only had 130 names, but each issue loses more names than

loss * for later meetings. ICCV-2 was close to break even or a small loss.

lot * in return, but it requires a lot of work for the people doing it.
* leave IEEE. All of these involve doing a lot of work, and there is
* not a lot of people that will devote the time and effort to do the
* Processing, Pattern Recognition Systems, and Computer Vision. A lot of

low * (And said the chance of this happening is very low)
* Comment that posters had 2 pages -- that was low. Possible same
* CS is discussing a proceedings package for TC members (at low
* of us want to to be with IEEE, to have low cost journal. Maybe
* some as low as $45. Osaka is considerably cheaper than Tokyo. The
* Steve: afraid that the number that would commit to the time is low.
* within IEEE, and the low cost. Private publishers are happy to
7 for low.

lower * a list of available lower cost nearby hotels.
* at a lower level.
* fewer members would mean (lower dues, fewer IAPR members).

lshapiro * (LShapiro) Comments on next progComm.