object * in Object Recognition; Multi-Dim medical analysis(F)) Still space

observed * are comparable to past meetings. He also observed that this is the

october * (Possible dates, in October 1995; or Week before Thanksgiving.)
* 2. Non-rigid Motion Workshop. Jake Agarwal. Held last October.
* Agenda item #5: Motion Workshop (October 7-9) (P. Anandan): 125 papers
* in the fall of 1990 (October/November), with Prof. Nagao as the
* Ranging workshop (Bir Bhanu) on October 9 with 9 presentations, then 4

offending * Discussion centered on offending others (Europe, the US not attending

offered * newsletter. When electronic was offered, only 100 responded. The

offering * For future meeting, if this is done, consider offering an extra

office * Program Comm: 40; Office 22, Advance program 22, call for papers
* The office is filled by the IEEE Computer Society president on the

officers * (Grimson) We do have an EC as the 4 officers (C, VC, S, T).
* Agenda item #9: J. Aggarwal discussed the need for several officers.
* become a society (the officers).
* guidelines and other TC officers). Send any comments to E. Kent.
* service as the past chair. The appointed officers were announced:

ohta * a. Beijing proposal: Ma, Huang, Faugeras, Ohta, A. Jain;

olaf * final decisions by the program co-chairs (Tsuji, Olaf, and Kak), they

omni * signed (Omni Park Central, NYC), the rates will be a bit higher than

once * (Freeman) Cultural problem, once a conference doesn't have some
* 2 years (the delegates meet once every 2 years at ICPR).
* for the award. The award is given at most once a year, past recipients include

one * #2 Discussion (Kak): did we broaden the scope? After the last one
* (Miami). (Tom Huang, General Chair). Two tracks, one on Motion on
* (Nevatia) The basic issue is one of size -- PR/CV/IP -- and a
* 160 papers. One issue to think about is the single track, which would
*

  • Strong desire for one strong conference with a few of the best papers.
    * account limit of $30K at any one time. The surplus helps ease planning
    * arranged along with a one day workshop.
    * at CMU (one of the 10 highest at CMU 500 per week -- send mail to
    * Avi: R and A runs a big one without the support (but only that one).
    * be combined into the PAMI newsletter (one mailing). Thus,
    * classification, stocastic, ...). One role of prog. comm. is to be
    * current limit on funds in a TC account is $30,000 at one time. The
    * least one from the program committee. In the January Program Committee
    * Motion (TC chair is one of the delegates) carried, no opposition.
    * no more than 35 to one member. There are 92 non-US papers. A January
    * no one who is strong). Q: regarding who was on the ProgCom -- not
    * one is at 1K. Advantage is wide circulation because of being
    * papers as good. In this one Doc Anal had 2 submitted and 1 is in.
    * plan). As always, encourage associated workshops like this one.
    * Policy on Multiple submissions, should there be one, is there one, how
    * PR papers) or that no good ones were there. Question is whether we
    * prices), e.g. one package is CVPR, another is CVPR+xxx, etc.
    * question of whether one conference can handle all of them is another
    * really want to have one. (Steve) At the moment we do not have the
    * Recognition papers, but the ones submitted were bad.
    * recognition, all in one place. This gives a conference ranging from AI
    * Steve: R&A really was formed by the efforts of one person.
    * submissions and then to request that they withdraw the paper from one
    * whether one month or 6 months apart, travel to major conferences
    31 for one.

    only * 250-280. The only problem was the representation of US universities
    * Avi: R and A runs a big one without the support (but only that one).
    * but it should be NEWS, even if it is only 2 pages and important that
    * etc. --- Current motion is only to broaden the meeting. Separate
    * generated and only had 130 names, but each issue loses more names than
    * In 1995 there is only 1 major conference, so proposed to have a CV
    * leaves. (Get 35% of profit of the conference only.) (AJ:) It is
    * newsletter. When electronic was offered, only 100 responded. The
    * only make hard decisions after the reviews have done most of the
    * papers are expected, but only 50-60 per track (240 total) will be
    * results only
    * submission is in the Final form -- 6 pages in final form and only 6
    12 for only.

    open * Open question is whether there is running commentary (currently no).
    * open up the process. But we are not keeping track of who comes and
    * still too narrow. Open discussion on whether it is broad enough.

    opposed * Passed with 1 opposed.
    * Passed with 2 opposed. Uncountable was for.
    * Signal Processing). The Computer Society Board opposed the T-IP

    opposition * 1993, in Pittsburgh. Passed, no opposition.
    * Motion (TC chair is one of the delegates) carried, no opposition.
    * successful meeting at AAAI-90. Passed with no opposition.
    * to the authors, be retained was passed with no opposition.

    optical * Agenda item #16: New Business: Bobick discussed the Optical Society of

    option * We will allow members to request a no paper option.

    order * Called to order at 9:11 EDT by Avi Kak.
    * Meeting called to order at 8:36PM. 41 members signed in.
    * Meeting called to order at 9:10PM. 79 members signed in.
    * Meeting called to order, by Linda Shapiro at 8:10

    organization * organization itself. At the moment it is not clear that we do not

    organizers * Comments were duly noted by the organizers.

    organizing * with China. H. Freeman discussed the organizing problems. About 680

    origin * origin of CVPR from PRIP for the purpose to bring in Computer Vision

    original * And the problem of getting more than the original 550 copies
    * original paper. There is some support for topical survey papers --
    * unknown number of these are students. The original budget projection

    osaka * Item 9. ICCV-3. (Avi Kak) Will be held in Osaka, December 4-7, 1990,
    * some as low as $45. Osaka is considerably cheaper than Tokyo. The

    other * (for presented and other papers). There will be an associated Passive
    * between the CVPR submission and other submissions, and the general
    * Bir: Others spend on student scholarships.
    * Bombay, mid-December. In association with other meetings in Bombay,
    * can be done between meetings. There is a need for other meetings.
    * committee of 50 people. Try to add other workshops around ICCV, if
    * directions by drawing on the best few papers for the other meetings
    * Discussion centered on offending others (Europe, the US not attending
    * discussion of worry and how to deal with overlap of other conferences
    * guidelines and other TC officers). Send any comments to E. Kent.
    * keep other editors informed of the use of reviewers.
    * meeting and others. Physically at MIT. For the A/V facilities for
    * nominations and other awards. Passed.
    * on other.
    * or the other conference.
    * other committees. The
    * other good papers.
    * papers and other material.
    * Performance vs. robustness. Applied statistics and others.
    * program, it requires a comment on other submissions. The program
    * Q: Re IEEE sponsored vs private journal? PAMI 10K copies, no other
    * recognition not diluted by others. But expression may enter in.
    * some discussion of a West Coast location, with no other suggestions at
    * support other meetings. CVPR generates maybe 10K surplus. Today
    * TAB) other (Image database -- Mosaic). Steve Shafer:CV home page
    * the TCs. Other journals in CS are less related others are
    * there are not the other conferences that make tons of money.
    * with 100K members, about 150 core volunteers, and 10-15K other
    * you want other workshops get the ideas in. Some supported by the
    30 for other.

    otherwise * No explaination of why Eric was told otherwise.
    * The rainy season is December/January, otherwise there is no difference

    our * Eric G: Herb hit the issue, control over our fate in addition to
    * No action on our part.
    * this. So state our goal and discuss the structure:
    * We are now maintaining our own list

    out * Agenda item #4: The PAMI newsletter has been sent out to the full
    * Motion: (Haralick) Specifically call out Image Processing and its subtopics
    * amount of paper the program chair needs to handle and mail out.
    * be out in the winter with a CVPR report, updated bylaws, etc. From the
    * budget to send out a newsletter.
    * Can we take the journal? Threaten to pull out and see what happens.
    * international issues at a national meeting, it was pointed out that the
    * On CVPR94, the area of Image Processing is not called out.
    * out a cheaper meal alternative. Airfare is $400-500 (with no Saturday
    * possiblity that IAPR would kick the US out anyway, and that IAPR might
    * TC is responsible to mail out the IPAR newsletter. Currently twice
    * the call for papers is already out, what it real means, how much
    * The Call for Papers is out. The meeting is single track, planning for
    * The call for papers is out. There are 4 days before and 4 days after
    * were sent out for determining the Roberts award. There was also some
    15 for out.

    outlet * past there has been a Workshop on Computer Vision as an outlet for

    outside * tracks, number of days, length of papers) to reduce future outside

    outsiders * outsiders (psychology mostly).

    outstanding * outstanding contribution to the information processing field for fundamental

    over * Agenda item #13: Transactions on PAMI: (A. K. Jain) Took over in
    * control over its income, its mailing list, its activities (including
    * CVPR, etc., publish in the journal over the past 4 years.
    * discussed and a possible third review was done (20 to each member over 1
    * Draft a petitiion (and signed by over 100 people) to IEEE that we
    * Eric G: Herb hit the issue, control over our fate in addition to
    * groups will go over papers in more detail. The review form is
    * Held in Tskuba Japan this fall, over 260 papers, 20 were long 124
    * Pages will remain constant over the near term.
    * Q: Motion can lead to many papers? Still struggling over how to get
    * The term is over for Avi Kak. The nomination Committee of Tom
    * to balance Pattern Recognition and IP. Over the years, Computer
    12 for over.

    overhead * CS overhead.

    overlap * committee to ask authors if they have an overlap in their
    * discussion of worry and how to deal with overlap of other conferences
    * Explore why the problems have an overlap.
    * overlap). There will be a motion track, expect to have 2 tracks
    * proposal due to the large overlap with PAMI. Al Bovik commented that

    overwhelming * Passed: (Overwhelming, no exact count taken).

    own * We are now maintaining our own list


    Last update:Fri Jul 14 08:58:20 PDT 1995
    Maintained by Keith Price, price@usc.edu
    Comments are welcome (or use email in Netscape, or the above address).