object
* in Object Recognition; Multi-Dim medical analysis(F)) Still space
observed
* are comparable to past meetings. He also observed that this is the
october
* (Possible dates, in October 1995; or Week before Thanksgiving.)
* 2. Non-rigid Motion Workshop. Jake Agarwal. Held last October.
* Agenda item #5: Motion Workshop (October 7-9) (P. Anandan): 125 papers
* in the fall of 1990 (October/November), with Prof. Nagao as the
* Ranging workshop (Bir Bhanu) on October 9 with 9 presentations, then 4
offending
* Discussion centered on offending others (Europe, the US not attending
offered
* newsletter. When electronic was offered, only 100 responded. The
offering
* For future meeting, if this is done, consider offering an extra
office
* Program Comm: 40; Office 22, Advance program 22, call for papers
* The office is filled by the IEEE Computer Society president on the
officers
* (Grimson) We do have an EC as the 4 officers (C, VC, S, T).
* Agenda item #9: J. Aggarwal discussed the need for several officers.
* become a society (the officers).
* guidelines and other TC officers). Send any comments to E. Kent.
* service as the past chair. The appointed officers were announced:
ohta
* a. Beijing proposal: Ma, Huang, Faugeras, Ohta, A. Jain;
olaf
* final decisions by the program co-chairs (Tsuji, Olaf, and Kak), they
omni
* signed (Omni Park Central, NYC), the rates will be a bit higher than
once
* (Freeman) Cultural problem, once a conference doesn't have some
* 2 years (the delegates meet once every 2 years at ICPR).
* for the award. The award is given at most once a year, past recipients include
one
* #2 Discussion (Kak): did we broaden the scope? After the last one
* (Miami). (Tom Huang, General Chair). Two tracks, one on Motion on
* (Nevatia) The basic issue is one of size -- PR/CV/IP -- and a
* 160 papers. One issue to think about is the single track, which would
*
* account limit of $30K at any one time. The surplus helps ease planning
* arranged along with a one day workshop.
* at CMU (one of the 10 highest at CMU 500 per week -- send mail to
* Avi: R and A runs a big one without the support (but only that one).
* be combined into the PAMI newsletter (one mailing). Thus,
* classification, stocastic, ...). One role of prog. comm. is to be
* current limit on funds in a TC account is $30,000 at one time. The
* least one from the program committee. In the January Program Committee
* Motion (TC chair is one of the delegates) carried, no opposition.
* no more than 35 to one member. There are 92 non-US papers. A January
* no one who is strong). Q: regarding who was on the ProgCom -- not
* one is at 1K. Advantage is wide circulation because of being
* papers as good. In this one Doc Anal had 2 submitted and 1 is in.
* plan). As always, encourage associated workshops like this one.
* Policy on Multiple submissions, should there be one, is there one, how
* PR papers) or that no good ones were there. Question is whether we
* prices), e.g. one package is CVPR, another is CVPR+xxx, etc.
* question of whether one conference can handle all of them is another
* really want to have one. (Steve) At the moment we do not have the
* Recognition papers, but the ones submitted were bad.
* recognition, all in one place. This gives a conference ranging from AI
* Steve: R&A really was formed by the efforts of one person.
* submissions and then to request that they withdraw the paper from one
* whether one month or 6 months apart, travel to major conferences
31 for one.
only
* 250-280. The only problem was the representation of US universities
* Avi: R and A runs a big one without the support (but only that one).
* but it should be NEWS, even if it is only 2 pages and important that
* etc. --- Current motion is only to broaden the meeting. Separate
* generated and only had 130 names, but each issue loses more names than
* In 1995 there is only 1 major conference, so proposed to have a CV
* leaves. (Get 35% of profit of the conference only.) (AJ:) It is
* newsletter. When electronic was offered, only 100 responded. The
* only make hard decisions after the reviews have done most of the
* papers are expected, but only 50-60 per track (240 total) will be
* results only
* submission is in the Final form -- 6 pages in final form and only 6
12 for only.
open
* Open question is whether there is running commentary (currently no).
* open up the process. But we are not keeping track of who comes and
* still too narrow. Open discussion on whether it is broad enough.
opposed
* Passed with 1 opposed.
* Passed with 2 opposed. Uncountable was for.
* Signal Processing). The Computer Society Board opposed the T-IP
opposition
* 1993, in Pittsburgh. Passed, no opposition.
* Motion (TC chair is one of the delegates) carried, no opposition.
* successful meeting at AAAI-90. Passed with no opposition.
* to the authors, be retained was passed with no opposition.
optical
* Agenda item #16: New Business: Bobick discussed the Optical Society of
option
* We will allow members to request a no paper option.
order
* Called to order at 9:11 EDT by Avi Kak.
* Meeting called to order at 8:36PM. 41 members signed in.
* Meeting called to order at 9:10PM. 79 members signed in.
* Meeting called to order, by Linda Shapiro at 8:10
organization
* organization itself. At the moment it is not clear that we do not
organizers
* Comments were duly noted by the organizers.
organizing
* with China. H. Freeman discussed the organizing problems. About 680
origin
* origin of CVPR from PRIP for the purpose to bring in Computer Vision
original
* And the problem of getting more than the original 550 copies
* original paper. There is some support for topical survey papers --
* unknown number of these are students. The original budget projection
osaka
* Item 9. ICCV-3. (Avi Kak) Will be held in Osaka, December 4-7, 1990,
* some as low as $45. Osaka is considerably cheaper than Tokyo. The
other
* (for presented and other papers). There will be an associated Passive
* between the CVPR submission and other submissions, and the general
* Bir: Others spend on student scholarships.
* Bombay, mid-December. In association with other meetings in Bombay,
* can be done between meetings. There is a need for other meetings.
* committee of 50 people. Try to add other workshops around ICCV, if
* directions by drawing on the best few papers for the other meetings
* Discussion centered on offending others (Europe, the US not attending
* discussion of worry and how to deal with overlap of other conferences
* guidelines and other TC officers). Send any comments to E. Kent.
* keep other editors informed of the use of reviewers.
* meeting and others. Physically at MIT. For the A/V facilities for
* nominations and other awards. Passed.
* on other.
* or the other conference.
* other committees. The
* other good papers.
* papers and other material.
* Performance vs. robustness. Applied statistics and others.
* program, it requires a comment on other submissions. The program
* Q: Re IEEE sponsored vs private journal? PAMI 10K copies, no other
* recognition not diluted by others. But expression may enter in.
* some discussion of a West Coast location, with no other suggestions at
* support other meetings. CVPR generates maybe 10K surplus. Today
* TAB) other (Image database -- Mosaic). Steve Shafer:CV home page
* the TCs. Other journals in CS are less related others are
* there are not the other conferences that make tons of money.
* with 100K members, about 150 core volunteers, and 10-15K other
* you want other workshops get the ideas in. Some supported by the
30 for other.
otherwise
* No explaination of why Eric was told otherwise.
* The rainy season is December/January, otherwise there is no difference
our
* Eric G: Herb hit the issue, control over our fate in addition to
* No action on our part.
* this. So state our goal and discuss the structure:
* We are now maintaining our own list
out
* Agenda item #4: The PAMI newsletter has been sent out to the full
* Motion: (Haralick) Specifically call out Image Processing and its subtopics
* amount of paper the program chair needs to handle and mail out.
* be out in the winter with a CVPR report, updated bylaws, etc. From the
* budget to send out a newsletter.
* Can we take the journal? Threaten to pull out and see what happens.
* international issues at a national meeting, it was pointed out that the
* On CVPR94, the area of Image Processing is not called out.
* out a cheaper meal alternative. Airfare is $400-500 (with no Saturday
* possiblity that IAPR would kick the US out anyway, and that IAPR might
* TC is responsible to mail out the IPAR newsletter. Currently twice
* the call for papers is already out, what it real means, how much
* The Call for Papers is out. The meeting is single track, planning for
* The call for papers is out. There are 4 days before and 4 days after
* were sent out for determining the Roberts award. There was also some
15 for out.
outlet
* past there has been a Workshop on Computer Vision as an outlet for
outside
* tracks, number of days, length of papers) to reduce future outside
outsiders
* outsiders (psychology mostly).
outstanding
* outstanding contribution to the information processing field for fundamental
over
* Agenda item #13: Transactions on PAMI: (A. K. Jain) Took over in
* control over its income, its mailing list, its activities (including
* CVPR, etc., publish in the journal over the past 4 years.
* discussed and a possible third review was done (20 to each member over 1
* Draft a petitiion (and signed by over 100 people) to IEEE that we
* Eric G: Herb hit the issue, control over our fate in addition to
* groups will go over papers in more detail. The review form is
* Held in Tskuba Japan this fall, over 260 papers, 20 were long 124
* Pages will remain constant over the near term.
* Q: Motion can lead to many papers? Still struggling over how to get
* The term is over for Avi Kak. The nomination Committee of Tom
* to balance Pattern Recognition and IP. Over the years, Computer
12 for over.
overlap
* committee to ask authors if they have an overlap in their
* discussion of worry and how to deal with overlap of other conferences
* Explore why the problems have an overlap.
* overlap). There will be a motion track, expect to have 2 tracks
* proposal due to the large overlap with PAMI. Al Bovik commented that
overwhelming
* Passed: (Overwhelming, no exact count taken).
own
* We are now maintaining our own list