qualified * qualified people. Was it the history of the meeting (rejecting past

qualitative * Agenda Item #5: Qualitative Vision Workshop: Phil Kahn. In

quality * good -- this leads to multiple journals, etc. Strive for quality.
* that quality
* were poorly considered. (T. Binford) Quality is shown by innovation and

quarter * (due to conflicts with schools on the quarter system).

question * A question regarding the weighting down of some reviewers since they
* allowed by the Computer Society. The question is wheather to charge
* Open question is whether there is running commentary (currently no).
* PR papers) or that no good ones were there. Question is whether we
* question of whether one conference can handle all of them is another
* Question regarding the dates (M-W before Thanksgiving), Gerard is
* Questions regarding local expenses: under $70 for hotel is possible,
7 for question.

quickly * the 3 reviews, 2 come quickly, the third takes time.

quite * (L. Shapiro) Posters as not quite yet done and submitted as posters.

quotas * Discussion: not wanting quotas, but the reviews were done by