ullman
* c. Singapore proposal: Mital, Aggarwal, Ullman, Kittler
unanimous
* (who is willing). Moved and seconded, unanimous.
uncountable
* Passed with 2 opposed. Uncountable was for.
under
* be a separate society under IEEE.
* be held there under IEEE-CS. It is now sponsored by SPIE and the Cosmos
* Questions regarding local expenses: under $70 for hotel is possible,
unifies
*
univ
* Univ of Zurich with PAMI TC as cooperate.
universities
* 250-280. The only problem was the representation of US universities
* etc.) A balance of Industry, government and universities. Discussion
university
* committee is being assembled and will meet at the University of
* during the university school year, and the attempt to make sure that
* Rooms range from $15-$150, with the University connections. ACCV (Asian
* University.
unknown
* unknown number of these are students. The original budget projection
unpublished
* requirement for new unpublished work already stated in the call for
until
* Admendment that the dates will be held until until Boston in 95.
* known until late in the process.
* retain more conference income, but decisions were postponed until the
upcoming
* #7. Upcoming CAD-Based vision (Ikeuchi). 1994, February 8-10 (W-F)
updated
* be out in the winter with a CVPR report, updated bylaws, etc. From the
* Comment that the TC list should be updated and maintained.
upstairs
* conference, upstairs rooms are HOT. (L. Davis): about 270
urbana
* after 5 meetings in cities (well Champaign-Urbana). Several things
* Agenda item #8: CVPR 1992, June 15-20, Urbana IL. (N. Ahuja):
usc
* Formal motion that CVPR 97 that the USC group is is willing to do
use
* (Joe) Roughly speaking, the use of information not involved with
* keep other editors informed of the use of reviewers.
* Linda: We do use some of the pieces, do we want to provide the
used
* images used in papers to a data base), when to add since the student
* Radius where context is used. Time Tied to ICCV.
* reviewers are used (more than the committee) for 311 papers, 197 US, 23
* were submitted and 3 reviewers will be used. About 35 are expected.
usual
* the same time, which brought up the usual long discussed issues of
usually
* IEEE-CS members. The first review is usually in <6 months with some
utah
* Utah. A discussion followed: